Re: [arch-general] Several advices about Perl Package Packaging Standards

2011-03-08 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Jeremiah Dodds wrote: > > I'd assume it was a library for interfacing with spamassasin from perl code. bingo ... - == binding/interface/bridge/etc/etc ... this is the defacto scheme that extends far beyond cpan. i would have naturally thought the same thing, and

Re: [arch-general] Several advices about Perl Package Packaging Standards

2011-03-08 Thread Jeremiah Dodds
2011/3/8 Ángel Velásquez > > I share your opinion. > > -1 to that proposal, users of spamassasin doesn't even know that > spamassasin is coded on perl . > > Another -1 from me. If I saw a package called perl-mail-spamassasin, I'd assume it was a library for interfacing with spamassasin from perl

Re: [arch-general] Several advices about Perl Package Packaging Standards

2011-03-08 Thread Ángel Velásquez
2011/3/9 Auguste Pop : > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:58 AM, 郑文辉 wrote: >> Hey,guys >> >> I have several thoughts about perl packages packing standards. >> >> First,It seems to me that renaming spamassassin to >> perl-mail-spamassassin which following the cpan perl packages naming >> standard is bett

Re: [arch-general] Several advices about Perl Package Packaging Standards

2011-03-08 Thread Auguste Pop
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:58 AM, 郑文辉 wrote: > Hey,guys > > I have several thoughts about perl packages packing standards. > > First,It seems to me that renaming spamassassin to > perl-mail-spamassassin which following the cpan perl packages naming > standard is better.May be we can add a feature t

[arch-general] Several advices about Perl Package Packaging Standards

2011-03-08 Thread 郑文辉
Hey,guys I have several thoughts about perl packages packing standards. First,It seems to me that renaming spamassassin to perl-mail-spamassassin which following the cpan perl packages naming standard is better.May be we can add a feature to PKGBULD that allowing package have several alias.Ex,per