On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 02:41:01PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:29:57 +0800
> schrieb Auguste Pop :
>
> > .pacsave indicates that /etc/syslog-ng.conf no longer exists in the
> > package. although it's still not an explicit warning. anyway, we can
> > use logic. ;-)
>
> Other
Am Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:29:57 +0800
schrieb Auguste Pop :
> .pacsave indicates that /etc/syslog-ng.conf no longer exists in the
> package. although it's still not an explicit warning. anyway, we can
> use logic. ;-)
Otherwise there would have been a /etc/syslog-ng.conf.pacnew and not
a /etc/syslog
2011/2/27 Sebastian Köhler :
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:04:11 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> You would have got a message about a pacsave file being created.
>
> Which I responded to with a "mv /etc/sylog-ng.conf.pacsave
> /etc/syslog-ng.conf"
> because there was no indication that the conf file is
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:04:11 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
You would have got a message about a pacsave file being created.
Which I responded to with a "mv /etc/sylog-ng.conf.pacsave
/etc/syslog-ng.conf"
because there was no indication that the conf file is now at another
place.
Sebastian
--
Th
On 27/02/11 01:42, Sebastian Köhler wrote:
Hi,
who had the glorious idea to move the syslog-ng.conf from /etc/ to
/etc/syslog-ng/ without telling anyone? I lost about 1 weeks of log
entries because of this. I understand why it was moved but what
happenend to announcing such changes? I think a mes
Hi,
who had the glorious idea to move the syslog-ng.conf from /etc/ to
/etc/syslog-ng/ without telling anyone? I lost about 1 weeks of log
entries because of this. I understand why it was moved but what
happenend to announcing such changes? I think a message in
post_upgrade() is not to much to ask
6 matches
Mail list logo
