> Not using fprint, but merely an idea (you have possibly already checked
> that): maybe the PAM-file for the screenlocker has a higher priority for
> passwords than for the fingerprint sensor while the rest has it the
> other way around.
>
> iirc this depends on the ordering of the corresponding
Am 20.10.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Bennett Piater:
> However, every screen locker I have tried that supports PAM at all
> (i3lock, xlockmore, xscreensaver, kscreenlocker) all ask for my
> fingerprint AFTER I typed in my password.
Not using fprint, but merely an idea (you have possibly already checked
> Unfortunately I can't help you, I'm just curious.
Well, you did anyway!
> If you type no password at all, just push enter, does the fingerprint
> check allow you to unlock the screen? Or doesn't it appear, if you just
> push enter without typing a password?
I tested it with kscreenlocker and
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:13:59 +0200, Bennett Piater wrote:
>However, every screen locker I have tried that supports PAM at all
>(i3lock, xlockmore, xscreensaver, kscreenlocker) all ask for my
>fingerprint AFTER I typed in my password.
Unfortunately I can't help you, I'm just curious.
If you type
Hi all,
I have been trying to get fprint working properly with screen lockers
for months and have yet to find a working solution.
I am using i3wm without DM.
Login on the TTY and sudo work properly: They ask me to swipe the finger
and then ask for my password if that didn't work.
However, every
5 matches
Mail list logo
