Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Denis Kobozev
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > As a distro, we only update packages to "latest stable". There are a > few exceptions, especially those that are slow in releasing stable > versions of their software or are generally high-level tools that > rarely break. So if the maintainer of

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Ray Rashif
On 28 August 2010 02:33, Denis Kobozev wrote: > I don't know what's worse - installing Vala to build these from AUR or > read the 1 millionth request to update Vala :) The thing is we have to include whatever is a makedep in the repos (because we provide ABS; nothing to do with AUR). A more preci

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/27/2010 09:33 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 08/27/2010 08:58 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote: Wouldn't it be easier for you and everybody else if you deleted vala from the repo completely? There are no packages that require it and users who need i

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Denis Kobozev
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 08/27/2010 08:58 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote: >> Wouldn't it be easier for you and everybody else if you deleted vala >> from the repo completely? There are no packages that require it and >> users who need it have to get the latest version from

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/27/2010 08:58 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote: for the 99 time, vala 0.9.x is the devel branch and i'm not going to update it. shotwell was updated to 0.7 and vala 0.9.5 is a _makedepends_ not a depends for this app Wouldn't it be easier for you and everybody else if you deleted vala from th

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Denis Kobozev
> for the 99 time, vala 0.9.x is the devel branch and i'm not going to > update it. > > shotwell was updated to 0.7 and vala 0.9.5 is a _makedepends_ not a depends > for this app Wouldn't it be easier for you and everybody else if you deleted vala from the repo completely? There are no package

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:09:27PM +0200, Andre Osku Schmidt wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jackson Alley > wrote: > >  On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > >> > >> On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: > >>> > >>> The vala package is several versions out of date and some

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Andre "Osku" Schmidt
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: >  On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >> >> On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: >>> >>> The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now >>> depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD: http://dpaste.com/234866/ Jackson for the 99 time, vala 0.9.x is the devel branch and i'm not going to upd

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Jackson Alley
On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD: http://dpaste.com/234866/ Jackson for the 99 time, vala 0.9.x i

[arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Jackson Alley
The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD: http://dpaste.com/234866/ Jackson