Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-05 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 04.06.2011 23:48, schrieb C Anthony Risinger: Separate /usr is 100% historical AFAICT ... per systemd it's unsupported, It is historical, yes. and IIRC its not perfect supported on any distro for a variety of

[arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread Myra Nelson
-- Forwarded message -- From: Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:10 Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2 To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Myra, On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote: One quick question, why do I still have udev 169 and udev 171 starting. As you correctly assumed, the first one is in initramfs. What has happened is that your initramfs has not been updated (this happens on

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread Myra Nelson
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:18, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:10 Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15,

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread mangust
On 06/04/2011 07:43 PM, Myra Nelson wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:18, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:10 Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2,

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Jun 4, 2011 1:54 PM, mangust m4ng...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/04/2011 07:43 PM, Myra Nelson wrote: I assume the next step will be to migrate /usr to the rootfs. No need to merge /usr with rootsf. See this thread http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-June/020564.html

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 04.06.2011 23:48, schrieb C Anthony Risinger: Separate /usr is 100% historical AFAICT ... per systemd it's unsupported, It is historical, yes. and IIRC its not perfect supported on any distro for a variety of reasons. I run several SuSE machines with /usr on a separate partition. Works

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread Myra Nelson
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 17:04, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 04.06.2011 23:48, schrieb C Anthony Risinger: Separate /usr is 100% historical AFAICT ... per systemd it's unsupported, It is historical, yes. and IIRC its not perfect supported on any distro for a variety of

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote: and IIRC its not perfect supported on any distro for a variety of reasons. I run several SuSE machines with /usr on a separate partition. Works fine. And right now, Arch should also work. It is historical and the

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread Myra Nelson
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 18:04, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote: and IIRC its not perfect supported on any distro for a variety of reasons. I run several SuSE machines with /usr on a separate partition. Works fine. And

Re: [arch-general] Was Fwd: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

2011-06-04 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote: My point wasn't to push any policy change. I'll follow what Arch wants to do. My last post was simply an explanation of why /usr was a separate partition historically, nothing more. Got it :-) My post was meant for