On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:07:46 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>Am 09.03.2017 um 12:52 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general
>> wrote:
>>> I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the
>>> features it delivers out of the box, and it
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:52 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote:
I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the
features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default.
However I found that Firefox' memory management
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote:
>I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the
>features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default.
>However I found that Firefox' memory management turns out preferable,
>since I had a few points
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:19:48 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>On 03/09/17 at 08:23am, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>>
>> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while
>> Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".
>
>Well it's not even Open Source software, so why would
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:23:06 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while
>Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".
>
>As far as I can see, Vivaldi is an Opera clone. I cannot see, how to
>replace Google as a search engine in Opera -
2017-03-09 8:23 GMT+01:00 Peter Nabbefeld :
[...]
> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while Opera
> is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".
That is how ArchLinux works:
The developers are volunteers who choose for themselves which
I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the
features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default.
However I found that Firefox' memory management turns out preferable,
since I had a few points where vivaldi would choke on too many tabs.
cheers!
mar77i
On 03/09/2017 02:23 AM, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while
> Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".
>
> As far as I can see, Vivaldi is an Opera clone. I cannot see, how to
> replace Google as a search engine in Opera - what
On 03/09/17 at 08:23am, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>
> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while Opera
> is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".
Well it's not even Open Source software, so why would someone be happy with a
blob.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Am 09.03.2017 um 04:49 schrieb Eli Schwartz via arch-general:
On 03/08/2017 10:07 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Ok I understand, https://aur.archlinux.org/login/ is an insecure web
site, since the issue mentioned by the OP happens with this login.
However, for my taste it's not a problem to select
10 matches
Mail list logo