Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:07:46 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >Am 09.03.2017 um 12:52 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: >> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general >> wrote: >>> I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the >>> features it delivers out of the box, and it

Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:52 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default. However I found that Firefox' memory management

Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the >features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default. >However I found that Firefox' memory management turns out preferable, >since I had a few points

Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:19:48 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >On 03/09/17 at 08:23am, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >> >> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while >> Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur". > >Well it's not even Open Source software, so why would

Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:23:06 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while >Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur". > >As far as I can see, Vivaldi is an Opera clone. I cannot see, how to >replace Google as a search engine in Opera -

Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Guus Snijders via arch-general
2017-03-09 8:23 GMT+01:00 Peter Nabbefeld : [...] > So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while Opera > is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur". That is how ArchLinux works: The developers are volunteers who choose for themselves which

Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Martin Kühne via arch-general
I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default. However I found that Firefox' memory management turns out preferable, since I had a few points where vivaldi would choke on too many tabs. cheers! mar77i

Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 03/09/2017 02:23 AM, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while > Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur". > > As far as I can see, Vivaldi is an Opera clone. I cannot see, how to > replace Google as a search engine in Opera - what

Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 03/09/17 at 08:23am, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while Opera > is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur". Well it's not even Open Source software, so why would someone be happy with a blob. -- Jelle van der Waa signature.asc

[arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-08 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Am 09.03.2017 um 04:49 schrieb Eli Schwartz via arch-general: On 03/08/2017 10:07 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Ok I understand, https://aur.archlinux.org/login/ is an insecure web site, since the issue mentioned by the OP happens with this login. However, for my taste it's not a problem to select