2012/8/11 Leonid Isaev :
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:29:46 -0500
> "David C. Rankin" wrote:
>
>> On 08/10/2012 02:25 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>> > I can't believe this. You are an Arch user and it never occurred to
>> > you that you should go check with a pacman -Ss gimp-light, and then
>> > when
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:29:46 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> On 08/10/2012 02:25 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> > I can't believe this. You are an Arch user and it never occurred to
> > you that you should go check with a pacman -Ss gimp-light, and then
> > when there is no result, check the AUR
On 08/10/2012 02:25 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> I can't believe this. You are an Arch user and it never occurred to
> you that you should go check with a pacman -Ss gimp-light, and then
> when there is no result, check the AUR? How about a pacman -Si
> scribus?
>
Believe it.
Here, the issue
On 10 August 2012 12:32, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> The latest scribus update attempts to install gimp-light 2.6.11 (not
> 2.6.12?)
> as a dependency for the update. This fails on my box because I created a
> gimp26
> package which is gimp 2.6.12.
>
> Is the 'gimp-light' being pulled
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:32 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> The latest scribus update attempts to install gimp-light 2.6.11 (not
> 2.6.12?)
> as a dependency for the update. This fails on my box because I created a
> gimp26
> package which is gimp 2.6.12.
>
> Is the 'gimp-light' bein
Guys,
The latest scribus update attempts to install gimp-light 2.6.11 (not 2.6.12?)
as a dependency for the update. This fails on my box because I created a gimp26
package which is gimp 2.6.12.
Is the 'gimp-light' being pulled in my scribus a full gimp 2.6 install? If it
is, I'm happy to dump
6 matches
Mail list logo
