On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Diego Viola wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> > > > Any
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> > > Any reasons?
> >
> > Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> > Any reasons?
>
> Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the
> name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux
>
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> Any reasons?
Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the
name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux
project. Just thought this might bear mentioning.
Am 01.05.2016 um 20:40 schrieb Diego Viola:
Any reasons?
Hi,
There is no special reason, the arch maintainers simply don't have
enough interest in this project.
You can install it from the AUR, though.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository
Any reasons?
8 matches
Mail list logo