On Friday 16 October 2009 07:30:51 pm Dario wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In data venerdì 16 ottobre 2009 23:20:45, Damjan Georgievski ha scritto:
> > Does you KDE work if you try to log in as a new clean user?
>
> I'd also try to use another login manager, if you haven't tried this way
> yet, trying another
On Friday 16 October 2009 04:20:45 pm Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > The fbcon is the Biggie!. But that is now some compiled into the kernel
> > magic that I'm pretty much at a loss to deal with. I installed
> > xf86-video-fbdev and the fbdev error is gone, but as others correctly
> > said, that was
Hi!
In data venerdì 16 ottobre 2009 23:20:45, Damjan Georgievski ha scritto:
> Does you KDE work if you try to log in as a new clean user?
I'd also try to use another login manager, if you haven't tried this way yet,
trying another desktop environment and trying to use the standard vesa driver
>
> The fbcon is the Biggie!. But that is now some compiled into the kernel magic
> that
> I'm pretty much at a loss to deal with. I installed xf86-video-fbdev and the
> fbdev error is gone, but as others correctly said, that wasn't the problem.
fbcon is the framebuffer console,i.e. a module that
On Friday 16 October 2009 06:11:10 am Guus Snijders wrote:
> 2009/10/16 David C. Rankin :
> > On Thursday 15 October 2009 06:06:15 pm David C. Rankin
>
> [...]
>
> >> Maybe a brake-through I managed to get a strace of startx. While the
> >> strace was running, I had a sustained X session with a s
2009/10/16 David C. Rankin :
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 06:06:15 pm David C. Rankin
[...]
>> Maybe a brake-through I managed to get a strace of startx. While the strace
>> was running, I had a sustained X session with a small xterm in the top-left
>> corner of the display. I couldn't do anythin
On Thursday 15 October 2009 06:06:15 pm David C. Rankin wrote:
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 05:54:11 pm David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Any other ideas welcomed :p
>
> Maybe a brake-through I managed to get a strace of startx. While the strace
> was running, I had a sustained X session with a small xt
On Thursday 15 October 2009 05:54:11 pm David C. Rankin wrote:
>
> Any other ideas welcomed :p
>
Maybe a brake-through I managed to get a strace of startx. While the strace
was running, I had a sustained X session with a small xterm in the top-left
corner of the display. I couldn't do anythin
On Thursday 15 October 2009 01:43:57 pm David C. Rankin wrote:
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 01:19:25 pm Xavier wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:08 PM, David C. Rankin
> >
> > wrote:
> > > latest Xorg.0.log is here:
> > >
> > > http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff/Xorg.0
On Thursday 15 October 2009 01:19:25 pm Xavier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:08 PM, David C. Rankin
>
> wrote:
> > latest Xorg.0.log is here:
> >
> > http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff/Xorg.0.log
>
> I don't see any errors in your xorg log. You are 100% sure it is t
On Thursday 15 October 2009 01:19:25 pm Xavier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:08 PM, David C. Rankin
>
> wrote:
> > latest Xorg.0.log is here:
> >
> > http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff/Xorg.0.log
>
> I don't see any errors in your xorg log. You are 100% sure it is t
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:08 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> latest Xorg.0.log is here:
>
> http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff/Xorg.0.log
>
>
I don't see any errors in your xorg log. You are 100% sure it is the
correct one ?
The timestamp from the log :
(==) Log file: "/var/
On Thursday 15 October 2009 07:47:11 am pascal wrote:
> Hi
> In the last Xorg.0.log I can see that you removed the "vga=0x31a" part. But
> the vesa module is still loaded (and unloaded short after) just after the
> intel module, and the output used is VGA1. I also have an 915 chipset
> (though a
On Thursday 15 October 2009 07:47:11 am pascal wrote:
> Hi
> In the last Xorg.0.log I can see that you removed the "vga=0x31a" part. But
> the vesa module is still loaded (and unloaded short after) just after the
> intel module, and the output used is VGA1. I also have an 915 chipset
> (though a
On Thursday 15 October 2009 04:48:44 am Rafa Griman wrote:
> Been looking through your log and see this line:
>
> Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda6 ro vga=0x31a
>
> Shouldn't you remove all the vga= and/or video= options in menu.lst?
>
> Maybe that's the problem.
>
> HTH
>
>Rafa
Le Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:48:44 +0200
Rafa Griman a écrit:
> Hi :)
>
> On Wednesday 14 October 2009 21:35:58 David C. Rankin wrote:
> > On Monday 12 October 2009 02:51:51 pm Dusty wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > >
> > > I have managed to upgrade (pacman -Syu) grabbing the new kernel upgrade
> > > and no
Hi :)
On Wednesday 14 October 2009 21:35:58 David C. Rankin wrote:
> On Monday 12 October 2009 02:51:51 pm Dusty wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I have managed to upgrade (pacman -Syu) grabbing the new kernel upgrade
> > and not killing my X using KMS.
> >
> > What I did to avoid the problems you guy
On Monday 12 October 2009 02:51:51 pm Dusty wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I have managed to upgrade (pacman -Syu) grabbing the new kernel upgrade and
> not killing my X using KMS.
>
> What I did to avoid the problems you guys are getting is the following:
>
> 1) Goto the ArchWiki and search for intel
On Monday 12 October 2009 11:47:59 am Dusty wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> I am tracking this email thread as this issue has affected a couple of
> colleagues of mine and I'm holding back upgrading my box until I know
> there is a definite resolution as I have been reading too many horror
> stories ar
:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] On Behalf Of Jan Spakula
Sent: 11 October 2009 09:34
To: arch-general
Subject: Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latestkernel
update
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009:
> On Sunday 11 October
[arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latestkernel
update
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009:
> On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> I'm back already. The wiki page must be out of date. It says to pu
21 matches
Mail list logo
