On Saturday 17 October 2009 11:41:31 am pascal wrote:
> Le Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:13:34 -0500
>
> "David C. Rankin" a écrit:
> > Sure, the whole log is here:
> >
> > http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff/pacman.log.bz
> >2
> >
> > I have put all the files related to the bug in
Le Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:13:34 -0500
"David C. Rankin" a écrit:
>
> Sure, the whole log is here:
>
> http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff/pacman.log.bz2
>
> I have put all the files related to the bug in that directory:
>
> http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bu
On Saturday 17 October 2009 05:50:29 am pascal wrote:
> Le Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:30:53 -0500
>
> "David C. Rankin" a écrit:
> > Here is what is showing up in the errors.log that shows the problem
> > started with the updates on 10/8
>
> Could you post the 60-70 last lines of /var/log/pacman.log ?
Le Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:30:53 -0500
"David C. Rankin" a écrit:
>
> Here is what is showing up in the errors.log that shows the problem started
> with the updates on 10/8
>
Could you post the 60-70 last lines of /var/log/pacman.log ?
On Thursday 15 October 2009 05:45:53 am Thomas Bewick wrote:
> Hi, I am no developer and just joined the list and not that experienced
> with Linux.
> So, if this is totally off the wall please bear with me.
> But I think I had a similar problem a few months back with Puppy Linux.
>
> I had upgrad
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 16:16 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:33:57 am Jan Spakula wrote:
> > Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009:
> > > On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> > > I'm back already. The wiki page
On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:33:57 am Jan Spakula wrote:
> Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009:
> > On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> > I'm back already. The wiki page must be out of date. It says to put the
> > following in modprobe
On Wednesday 14 October 2009 02:57:58 pm Loui Chang wrote:
>
> /etc/modprobe.conf is deprecated.
> /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf is used instead.
>
Thanks Loui!
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936)
On Wed 14 Oct 2009 13:45 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:33:57 am Jan Spakula wrote:
> > Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009:
> > > On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> > > I'm back already. The wiki page mu
On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:33:57 am Jan Spakula wrote:
> Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009:
> > On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> > I'm back already. The wiki page must be out of date. It says to put the
> > following in modprobe
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009:
> On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> I'm back already. The wiki page must be out of date. It says to put the
> following in modprobe.conf (which is deprecated):
>
> options i915 modeset=1
>
On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> The strange part is that if that is the problem, something changed
> with the 10/8 update. For many months, this box with the intel card just
> worked... I'll report back after reading through the wiki and either claim
> suc
On Saturday 10 October 2009 02:09:26 am Flavio Costa wrote:
> Is KMS enabled?
>
Is KM..what enabled?
That must have been a change I missed?? I'm reading back through
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Intel_Graphics to try and figure out what
it is and why I now need it but haven't s
Is KMS enabled?
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:39 AM, David C. Rankin <
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday 09 October 2009 06:24:06 am Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:53 +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > > > After the latest kernel update, I cannot start X for the A
On Friday 09 October 2009 06:24:06 am Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:53 +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > > After the latest kernel update, I cannot start X for the Arch box I
> > > have that has an onboard intel graphics card. (Dell 280GX sff) The
> > > errors are:
> > >
> > > 0
On Saturday 10 October 2009 12:25:41 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> On Friday 09 October 2009 06:24:06 am Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:53 +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > > > After the latest kernel update, I cannot start X for the Arch box I
> > > > have that has an onboard in
On Friday 09 October 2009 06:24:06 am Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:53 +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > > After the latest kernel update, I cannot start X for the Arch box I
> > > have that has an onboard intel graphics card. (Dell 280GX sff) The
> > > errors are:
> > >
> > > 0
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:53 +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > After the latest kernel update, I cannot start X for the Arch box I have
> > that
> > has an onboard intel graphics card. (Dell 280GX sff) The errors are:
> >
> > 02:31 nirvana:/srv/www/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff> grep "(EE)"
>
> After the latest kernel update, I cannot start X for the Arch box I have that
> has an onboard intel graphics card. (Dell 280GX sff) The errors are:
>
> 02:31 nirvana:/srv/www/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff> grep "(EE)"
> Xorg.0.log
> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??)
Listmates,
After the latest kernel update, I cannot start X for the Arch box I have that
has an onboard intel graphics card. (Dell 280GX sff) The errors are:
02:31 nirvana:/srv/www/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff> grep "(EE)"
Xorg.0.log
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (
20 matches
Mail list logo
