Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:25 -0400, Kyle wrote: > According to Ralf Mardorf: > > I'm still using grub legacy on my machine. Is there a reason not to use > > grub legacy anymore? I also used grub2, but I don't like it. I never > > used any other bootloader on a PC. > > I never noticed any drawbacks u

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Kyle
According to Ralf Mardorf: I'm still using grub legacy on my machine. Is there a reason not to use grub legacy anymore? I also used grub2, but I don't like it. I never used any other bootloader on a PC. I never noticed any drawbacks using grub legacy. If you are planning to keep your bootloader i

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
On 09/11/12 at 09:58am, Rodrigo Rivas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Curtis Shimamoto < > sugar.and.scru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The link I provided clearly shows you how to install to the mbr of a > > partition. > > > > As Bjoern Franke pointed out previously in this thread, there

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:26 -0400, Stephen E. Baker wrote: > On 10/09/2012 6:57 AM, Kyle wrote: > > According to Thomas Bächler: > >> Let me also express part of my personal opinion, which others might > >> disagree with: If you wanted high quality software, why did you install > >> GRUB? If you wa

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Stephen E. Baker
On 10/09/2012 6:57 AM, Kyle wrote: According to Thomas Bächler: Let me also express part of my personal opinion, which others might disagree with: If you wanted high quality software, why did you install GRUB? If you want a decent bootloader, use syslinux. Actually, at least from where I'm si

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Curtis Shimamoto < sugar.and.scru...@gmail.com> wrote: > The link I provided clearly shows you how to install to the mbr of a > partition. > As Bjoern Franke pointed out previously in this thread, there is no such thing as "the MBR of a partition". MBRs are only a

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
On 09/10/12 at 04:20am, John Hutchison wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:29:22AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > I have /dev/sda1 root, /dev/sda2 swap and /dev/sda3 /home. So this is not > > a single partition setup but a three partition setup if you count swap. > Assume for this that /dev/sda

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Kyle
According to Thomas Bächler: Let me also express part of my personal opinion, which others might disagree with: If you wanted high quality software, why did you install GRUB? If you want a decent bootloader, use syslinux. Actually, at least from where I'm sitting, this "personal opinion" has a

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread John Hutchison
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:29:22AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I have /dev/sda1 root, /dev/sda2 swap and /dev/sda3 /home. So this is not > a single partition setup but a three partition setup if you count swap. Assume for this that /dev/sda is the bootloader _AND_ the device. As was said before

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 10.09.2012 10:12, schrieb Jude DaShiell: > I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used > --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with > misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64 > target on the arch beginner's guide wa

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Bjoern Franke wrote: > > > > > > I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used > > --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with > > misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64 > > target on the arch b

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Bjoern Franke
> > I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used > --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with > misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64 > target on the arch beginner's guide was for ufi not bios. A bug like this >

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Curtis Shimamoto wrote: > On 09/09/12 at 11:15pm, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > I am learning more about my hardware doing an archlinux installation on an > > amd k8 athelon system. Apparently grub won't work without use of > > blocklists and it complains that blocklists are unre

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-09 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
On 09/09/12 at 11:15pm, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I am learning more about my hardware doing an archlinux installation on an > amd k8 athelon system. Apparently grub won't work without use of > blocklists and it complains that blocklists are unreliable so cannot embed > and for that reason won't i

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-09 Thread Victor Silva
2012/9/10 Jude DaShiell > I am learning more about my hardware doing an archlinux installation on an > amd k8 athelon system. Apparently grub won't work without use of > blocklists and it complains that blocklists are unreliable so cannot embed > and for that reason won't install. Fortunately a

[arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-09 Thread Jude DaShiell
I am learning more about my hardware doing an archlinux installation on an amd k8 athelon system. Apparently grub won't work without use of blocklists and it complains that blocklists are unreliable so cannot embed and for that reason won't install. Fortunately another boot loader other than