On Thu, 16 May 2019 16:06:51 +0100
Andy Pieters wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:23 PM mike lojkovic via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > Suggesting pacman add some portage style features for dependency
> > resolution and packaging? Modifying packages on a local system
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:55 AM Erich Eckner via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> What does "partial upgrade" mean in the context of a package compiled by
> the user?
>
>
Nothing much just daydreaming that if all packages have this user compiled
or not...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 16 May 2019, Andy Pieters wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:23 PM mike lojkovic via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
Suggesting pacman add some portage style features for dependency resolution
and packaging? Modifying pac
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:23 PM mike lojkovic via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Suggesting pacman add some portage style features for dependency resolution
> and packaging? Modifying packages on a local system to fix bugs caused by
> versions of packages?
>
>
Arch Linux has a
Suggesting pacman add some portage style features for dependency resolution
and packaging? Modifying packages on a local system to fix bugs caused by
versions of packages?
On Thu, May 16, 2019, 3:10 AM Erich Eckner via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I would like to encourage adding provided libraries of a package to its
"provides=()" array in the PKGBUILD.
Some background:
Updating the system libraries may break manually compiled packages. Having
the version of the system libraries fi
6 matches
Mail list logo
