Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 139, Issue 14

2016-05-17 Thread Jonathan Roemer
> On May 17, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Information Technology Works > wrote: > > ohh, ok. that makes sense. I would be glad to benchmark as many packages > as needed, assuming someone doesn't mind telling me how it needs to be > done. I started some preliminary work with Levente, and first indicatio

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 139, Issue 14

2016-05-17 Thread Information Technology Works
On 05/17/2016 07:00 AM, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote: > In the past there has been various (performance) reasons with gcc5 that > hold up stepping further, so the decision was to not backport gcc6 > patches and wait for gcc6 so arrive. Fortunately gcc6 arrived so the > topic landed agai