Am Di 03 Dez 2013 10:36:16 CET schrieb archli...@jelmail.com:
On 03/12/13 02:09, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer:
Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package.
No, he just wants a directory with every version of each package in it.
He
On 03/12/2013 10:36, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
> On 03/12/13 02:09, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>> [2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer:
>>> Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package.
>> No, he just wants a directory with every version of each package in it.
>> He w
On 03/12/13 02:09, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer:
Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package.
No, he just wants a directory with every version of each package in it.
He won't ever update the db (no `pacman -Sy`) but can still insta
[2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer:
> Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package.
No, he just wants a directory with every version of each package in it.
He won't ever update the db (no `pacman -Sy`) but can still install any
package he needs with `pacman -S`
On 02/12/13 14:51, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 02/12/2013 15:38, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all
versions
of the same package in the
On 02/12/2013 12:14, Don deJuan wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 02:52 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions
of the same package in the ARM.
Documentation[1] has been updated
On 02/12/2013 21:05, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
> On 02/12/13 14:51, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 15:38, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
>>> On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
>> I added a new *packages* tree. Tha
On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions
of the same package in the ARM.
Documentation[1] has been updated.
Hello Sébastien,
It's great that we have ARM again - tha
On 02/12/2013 15:38, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
> On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all
versions
of the same package in the ARM.
Documentation[1] has b
On 12/02/2013 02:52 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
>>> I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions
>>> of the same package in the ARM.
>>> Documentation[1] has been updated.
>>>
>> Hello Sébastien,
>>
>> It's great th
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
>
>> I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions
>> of the same package in the ARM.
>> Documentation[1] has been updated.
>>
> Hello Sébastien,
>
> It's great that we have ARM again - thank you for your good work to
>
On 05/09/2013 02:44, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Lieven Moors wrote:
> I setup an ARM-like on one server. You can access it at:
> http://seblu.net/a/arm/.
>
> # tree -L 3
> ├── 2013
> │ ├── 08
> │ │ └── 31
> │ └── 09
> │ ├── 01
> │ ├── ...
>
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> I created the following tree (don't remember former hierarchy, but
> seems compatible)
>
> # tree -L 3
> ├── 2013
> │ ├── 08
> │ │ └── 31
> │ └── 09
> │ ├── 01
> │ ├── ...
> │ └── 05
> ├── last -> 2013/09/05
>
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Lieven Moors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know what is happening with Arch Rollback Machine?
> The server (arm.konnichi.com) has been unavailable for more than a week now,
> and I'm depending on it to keep an offline machine up to date...
Hello,
I setup an ARM-l
On 23/08/2013 23:30, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
I have a copy of the last abs before arch switched to gnome3...
I use it to build the gnome2 in the kernels 3.10
Yes, some people still likes the old gnome2
with new libreoffice, firefox23, java7, eclipse...
You may want to consider using Mat
On Aug 24, 2013 12:02 PM, "Lieven Moors" wrote:
>
> It seems a new arch rollback machine has already been set up:
>
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1316259#p1316259
It seems that way. And it sounds like they will be getting it tuned up so
anyone can host a mirror.
For those of you
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:51:20AM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Florian Dejonckheere
> wrote:
> > I'd be interested in joining the maintenance team.
> me too
It seems a new arch rollback machine has already been set up:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic
[2013-08-24 10:51:20 +0100] Leonidas Spyropoulos:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Florian Dejonckheere
> wrote:
> > I'd be interested in joining the maintenance team.
> me too
Peter obviously had something useful to contribute to this list. Now,
wishing that you were on the team gets nothing d
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Florian Dejonckheere
wrote:
> I'd be interested in joining the maintenance team.
me too
--
Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
#include
int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}
I'd be interested in joining the maintenance team.
On Aug 24, 2013 9:03 AM, "Peter Baldridge" wrote:
> I run 3 colos and I would be happy to provide hardware and bandwidth. It's
> not a service I would use but if someone was interested in maintaining, I
> could probably have a dual core box with
I run 3 colos and I would be happy to provide hardware and bandwidth. It's
not a service I would use but if someone was interested in maintaining, I
could probably have a dual core box with 1tb raid-1 storage and bandwidth
online in short order. If someone wants to put together a maintenance team
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:52:52PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 23/08/13 19:36, Lieven Moors wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know what is happening with Arch Rollback Machine?
> > The server (arm.konnichi.com) has been unavailable for more than a week
> > now,
> > and I'm depending on it to
I have a copy of the last abs before arch switched to gnome3...
I use it to build the gnome2 in the kernels 3.10
Yes, some people still likes the old gnome2
with new libreoffice, firefox23, java7, eclipse...
On Friday, August 23, 2013, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2013-08-23 12:59, Joe Eaves wrote:
> > That's a shame, do we know why?
>
> Well, it is quite clearly explained in the link that was referenced
> earlier in
> this thread...
>
Yeah, obviously my message got through the moderation filter slower tha
On 08/23/2013 06:54 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Chris Down wrote:
>> On 2013-08-23 12:59, Joe Eaves wrote:
>>> That's a shame, do we know why?
>> Well, it is quite clearly explained in the link that was referenced earlier
>> in
>> this thread...
> Reading th
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2013-08-23 12:59, Joe Eaves wrote:
>> That's a shame, do we know why?
>
> Well, it is quite clearly explained in the link that was referenced earlier in
> this thread...
Reading through the thread I see there was some initial conversations
t
On 2013-08-23 12:59, Joe Eaves wrote:
> That's a shame, do we know why?
Well, it is quite clearly explained in the link that was referenced earlier in
this thread...
pgpU7XNkDphHq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> It has been shut down.
More details here:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1313360#p1313360
--
Cédric Girard
On 23 August 2013 12:52, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 23/08/13 19:36, Lieven Moors wrote:
>> Does anyone know what is happening with Arch Rollback Machine?
>> The server (arm.konnichi.com) has been unavailable for more than a week now,
>> and I'm depending on it to keep an offline machine up to date...
On 23/08/13 19:36, Lieven Moors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know what is happening with Arch Rollback Machine?
> The server (arm.konnichi.com) has been unavailable for more than a week now,
> and I'm depending on it to keep an offline machine up to date...
>
> Greetings,
>
> lieven
>
It has
Hi,
Does anyone know what is happening with Arch Rollback Machine?
The server (arm.konnichi.com) has been unavailable for more than a week now,
and I'm depending on it to keep an offline machine up to date...
Greetings,
lieven
31 matches
Mail list logo
