Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 09/05/2016 01:08 PM, Diego Viola wrote: >> Seems like 0.13 has finally entered in community-testing. >> >> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/bitcoin-qt/ > > Wow, a whole

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On 09/05/2016 01:08 PM, Diego Viola wrote: > Seems like 0.13 has finally entered in community-testing. > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/bitcoin-qt/ Wow, a whole 14 days. ;) And, of course, that disregards the fact that it was in staging for 10 days along with the

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:48:37AM +0800, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: > > > >> Yep that's my expectation. There were

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Diego Viola wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general > wrote: >> On 09/01/2016 06:00 PM, Diego Viola wrote: >>> No, I'm not saying that, please let's not make this personal, it's

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 09/01/2016 06:00 PM, Diego Viola wrote: >> No, I'm not saying that, please let's not make this personal, it's not. >> >> I'm also OK compiling my own bitcoin-qt or whatever, I'm just >> concerned

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

> I'm also OK compiling my own bitcoin-qt or whatever, I'm just > concerned there are many outdated packages as of late, and what makes > Arch so special to many people is the rolling release part and up to > date packages. It seems legitimate to expect the package to be up-to-date given it may be

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On 09/01/2016 06:00 PM, Diego Viola wrote: > No, I'm not saying that, please let's not make this personal, it's not. > > I'm also OK compiling my own bitcoin-qt or whatever, I'm just > concerned there are many outdated packages as of late, and what makes > Arch so special to many people is the

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 09/01/2016 02:20 PM, Diego Viola wrote: >> Well, I understand maintainers are busy, but it is your job as a >> maintainer to communicate effectively, if I put some package up for >> others to use it, it is MY

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

I just wish rEFInd would get an update. It's been out of date for close to 10 months now. I'm just wondering if having more than one maintainer on a package would help lighten the load. The maintainer of rEFInd has 221 other packages, so it's understandable that something might slip through on

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On 09/01/2016 02:20 PM, Diego Viola wrote: > Well, I understand maintainers are busy, but it is your job as a > maintainer to communicate effectively, if I put some package up for > others to use it, it is MY responsibility to tell users I won't be > able to update or respond quickly. > > You

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 15:20:49 -0300, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: >You can't expect all your users to maintain their own PKGBUILD for >outdated packages just because some maintainer is busy or being lazy. ABS was mentioned several times. Is there another rolling release more up to date and

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: > >> Yep that's my expectation. There were several times, that a new version >> with important fixes (fix for YouTube downloading, etc.)

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: Yep that's my expectation. There were several times, that a new version with important fixes (fix for YouTube downloading, etc.) was released, and lots of people came to our issue tracker for "broken" YouTube downloading because the Arch

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 18:58:48 +0200, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general wrote: >On 01/09/16 18:54, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: >> I'll need to review the PKGBUILD beforehand or write my >> own. > >This should be done for *ALL* AUR builds actually. Yesno ;). Some AUR maintainers, even

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general wrote: > On 01/09/16 18:54, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: >> >> I'll need to review the PKGBUILD beforehand or write my >> own. > > > This should be done for *ALL* AUR builds actually. > You should

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On 01/09/16 18:54, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: I'll need to review the PKGBUILD beforehand or write my own. This should be done for *ALL* AUR builds actually. You should always be aware of what you are running on your machine, especially if that involves sudo rights. Cheers, Kwang

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:24:08 -0300, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: >> through abs > > Yes, I think that's the best approach, I'll do that, thanks. Hi, if there should be a good reason to use the latest and greatest from the minute it is released, ABS [1] is what I use regularly, let alone

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 09/01/2016 12:41 PM, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: >> Sorry, I didn't meant to be rude or be offensive towards the AUR, the >> AUR is great, but when using things like bitcoin, how can you

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On 09/01/2016 12:41 PM, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: > Sorry, I didn't meant to be rude or be offensive towards the AUR, the > AUR is great, but when using things like bitcoin, how can you be safe > that using bitcoin-qt from the AUR is fine? > > What Emily suggested, actually building it

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Jeroen Mathon wrote: > Random, get your shit from bitcoins site then. :p > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:13 Diego Viola via arch-general, > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, D C via arch-general >>

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: > To be more specific, I'm talking about youtube-dl. I'm currently one of > youtube-dl maintainers, and I hope Arch users can always get the latest > version with pacman. Unfortunately, the package in [community] gets > updates slow in comparison with how

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Emily Shepherd via arch-general wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:13:00PM -0300, Diego Viola via arch-general > wrote: >> >> Thing is, I use bitcoin-qt to get paid for work, and I'm not going to >> put my hard earned money on random

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:13:00PM -0300, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: Thing is, I use bitcoin-qt to get paid for work, and I'm not going to put my hard earned money on random AUR packages for this. The reason I trust the package from the repo is that I'm hoping I can verify by signing

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Guus Snijders wrote: > Op 1 sep. 2016 18:00 schreef "Diego Viola via arch-general" > : >> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300 >>

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Some people have projects, or other things that take priority, if you have > a problem then get the git version from the AUR > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:01 Diego Viola via arch-general, < >

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

[Topic Closed] On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:14 Diego Viola via arch-general, < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Guus Snijders wrote: > > Op 1 sep. 2016 18:00 schreef "Diego Viola via arch-general" > > : > >> > >> On

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

Random, get your shit from bitcoins site then. :p On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:13 Diego Viola via arch-general, < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, D C via arch-general > wrote: > > Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol. >

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Guus Snijders wrote: > Op 1 sep. 2016 18:00 schreef "Diego Viola via arch-general" > : >> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300 >>

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, D C via arch-general wrote: > Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol. > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> Some people have projects, or other

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

Exactly On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:08 D C via arch-general, wrote: > Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol. > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > Some people have projects, or

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Some people have projects, or other things that take priority, if you have > a problem then get the git version from the AUR > > On Thu, 1

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300 > Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I flagged this package 10 days ago as out of date and I've been trying >> to contact the maintainer

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

Some people have projects, or other things that take priority, if you have a problem then get the git version from the AUR On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:01 Diego Viola via arch-general, < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard >

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

Op 1 sep. 2016 18:00 schreef "Diego Viola via arch-general" < arch-general@archlinux.org>: > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300 > > Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: > > > >> Hello, >

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300 Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: > Hello, > > I flagged this package 10 days ago as out of date and I've been trying > to contact the maintainer about it, with no response. > >

[arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

Hello, I flagged this package 10 days ago as out of date and I've been trying to contact the maintainer about it, with no response. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/bitcoin-qt/ Is there any problem with updating this? Any reasons for the delay or lack of response? Thanks,