On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 07:22:44AM -0600, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> I typically upgrade with -uu, and use [*testing]. I've noticed lately that
> there
> is a window when a package moves out of [testing] that it will be downgraded.
>
> For example, this happened when openssh-6.2 recently moved.
>
>
On Tuesday 26 March 2013 14:32:54 Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 26.03.2013 14:22, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> > I typically upgrade with -uu,
>
> Now why would you do that unless you explicitly want to downgrade? This
> is only useful if you disable testing and want to downgrade all
> packages. Upgrading
On 03/26/2013 07:32 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 26.03.2013 14:22, Matthew Monaco wrote:
>> I typically upgrade with -uu,
>
> Now why would you do that unless you explicitly want to downgrade? This
> is only useful if you disable testing and want to downgrade all
> packages. Upgrading is only on
Am 26.03.2013 14:22, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
> Are the packages being removed from [testing] before being added to e.g.
> [core]?
I think there is not, and if there is, it is not more than a few
microseconds.
> Does mirroring happen separately, but faster for [testing]? (I use
> kernel.org).
A
On 26.03.2013 14:22, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> I typically upgrade with -uu,
Now why would you do that unless you explicitly want to downgrade? This
is only useful if you disable testing and want to downgrade all
packages. Upgrading is only one -u.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
I typically upgrade with -uu, and use [*testing]. I've noticed lately that there
is a window when a package moves out of [testing] that it will be downgraded.
For example, this happened when openssh-6.2 recently moved.
Are the packages being removed from [testing] before being added to e.g. [core
6 matches
Mail list logo