On 02/03/2010 11:12 AM, pyther wrote:
> On 02/02/2010 09:05 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 02/02/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>>
> Arch does have any i586 packages...
>
Sorry - Yes it is an i686 box
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Naco
On 02/02/2010 09:05 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/02/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 02.02.2010 23:10, schrieb David C. Rankin:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-February/015269.html
I guess I could be helpful and actually respond with Pierre's p
On 02/02/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 02.02.2010 23:10, schrieb David C. Rankin:
>
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-February/015269.html
>
I guess I could be helpful and actually respond with Pierre's post to save
others a few clicks. Pierre provided the
On 02/02/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 02.02.2010 23:10, schrieb David C. Rankin:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Looks like there is a dependency conflict between qt and phonon with
>> the latest
>> packages. (note: below pms is an alias for 'pacman -Sy') Here is the issue:
>
> http://mailman.ar
Am 02.02.2010 23:10, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> Guys,
>
> Looks like there is a dependency conflict between qt and phonon with
> the latest
> packages. (note: below pms is an alias for 'pacman -Sy') Here is the issue:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-February/015
Guys,
Looks like there is a dependency conflict between qt and phonon with
the latest
packages. (note: below pms is an alias for 'pacman -Sy') Here is the issue:
16:07 dcrgx2:~> pms -u
:: Synchronizing package databases...
error: failed retrieving file 'testing.db.tar.gz' from mirrors.gi
6 matches
Mail list logo