Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-27 Thread christopher floess
It shouldn't. At one point I had a 32 bit Ubuntu, 64bit Arch, and WinXP 32, all booting from the same bootloader (Ubuntu's grub) and they all worked fine. Whenever I bork something beyond repair, I just chalk it up to the price of cutting edge software. That, and I can be back up in an id

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/26/2010 01:29 PM, christopher floess wrote: On 02/26/2010 09:18 PM, Gary Wright wrote: On 02/26/2010 08:41 AM, Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/26/2010 12:43 PM, christopher floess wrote: Maybe it's just my untrained eye, but things don't seem to be out of the ordinary here. /lib didn't show anything 32-bit. At this point, if I could be fairly certain that a reinstall would work, I'd try that. I'm just afraid that it won't produc

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread christopher floess
On 02/26/2010 09:18 PM, Gary Wright wrote: On 02/26/2010 08:41 AM, Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it something like "pacman -R --all !base" would be

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/26/2010 08:41 AM, Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it something like "pacman -R --all !base" would be nice -- Chris pacman -R $(pacman -Qq | grep

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread christopher floess
On 02/26/2010 01:00 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote: I'm out of ideas too, because they still segfault. Crap. I guess I could reinstall the system, but doesn't seem like the way to go here. I have X working with wmii. I just have nasty looking window decorations and random productivity Applicatio

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
> Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around > for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it > something like "pacman -R --all !base"  would be nice > > -- Chris > pacman -R $(pacman -Qq | grep -v "$(pacman -Qqg base)") Though I havn't te

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Damjan Georgievski
> I'm out of ideas too, because they still segfault. Crap. > > I guess I could reinstall the system, but doesn't seem like the way to go > here. I have X working with wmii. I just have nasty looking window > decorations and random productivity Applications that don't work. > > Is there a way to de-

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-25 Thread christopher floess
Hmm, those three shouldn't be the guilty party. Here's a bug report from the redhat bugtracker that details what kind of goofiness you can expect from corrupt hdd sectors/hard powerdowns: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488449#c11 I'd check your logs to see if there is anything

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-25 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/25/2010 03:02 PM, christopher floess wrote: Yeah, just tried it. No luck. I'm trying to figure out if it has something to do with the fact that I copied files over from my 32-bit install. I had 32-bit arch installed and then I realized that I have a 64-bit system, so I installed 64-bit a

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-25 Thread christopher floess
On 02/25/2010 09:46 PM, Gary Wright wrote: On 02/25/2010 01:40 PM, christopher floess wrote: By doing pacman -Qo /lib/ld-2.11.1.so, I get glibc, which is at version 2.11.1-1. I've tried doing pacman -Syu, but that hasn't resolved anything. I some how think this isn't a bug, but something I'm

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-25 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/25/2010 01:40 PM, christopher floess wrote: By doing pacman -Qo /lib/ld-2.11.1.so, I get glibc, which is at version 2.11.1-1. I've tried doing pacman -Syu, but that hasn't resolved anything. I some how think this isn't a bug, but something I'm doing wrong on my end. Any pointers on how to

[arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-25 Thread christopher floess
Hi all, I installed arch 64-bit on my t61 this weekend, and when I try to run midori or epiphany, and some other apps as well, I get midori[16445]: segfault at 8 ip 7f0d1093d963 sp 7fffb6e8a1e0 error 4 in ld-2.11.1.so[7f0d10933000+1e000] and epiphany[16664]: segfault at 8 ip