Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-26 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
JM wrote: > At the moment, libsoup is the only package on my system depending on > gconf and orbit2. I'd just prefer to avoid it rather than keep a > full-featured configuration database system for just one application. > It's not that much about having a "G" as about keeping it simple. > > Regards

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-26 Thread JM
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Andrei Thorp wrote: > +1 that I haven't had trouble with gconf really. At the moment, I > don't run it and aside from some warnings from some apps, it's > generally been fine too. > > -AT > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: >> On Sat, 2009-

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-24 Thread Andrei Thorp
+1 that I haven't had trouble with gconf really. At the moment, I don't run it and aside from some warnings from some apps, it's generally been fine too. -AT On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 02:28 +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Apr 200

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-24 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 02:28 +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:01:24 +0300 > Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:33 +0200, JM wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Jan de Groot > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:17 +0200, JM wrote: > > >

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-24 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:01:24 +0300 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:33 +0200, JM wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Jan de Groot > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:17 +0200, JM wrote: > > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot > > >> wrote: > > >> > O

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-24 Thread Alessandro Doro
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:34:16PM -0400, Andrei Thorp wrote: > > But it has a G in it, so I can't have it on my system! ;) > > Same reason I don't use gcc, git, gdb, the *G*NU tools in general, man > paGes, X.orG, doxygen, anything with gettext, GIMP, anything -ng, or > any pluGins. Don't even ta

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-24 Thread Andrei Thorp
> But it has a G in it, so I can't have it on my system! ;) Same reason I don't use gcc, git, gdb, the *G*NU tools in general, man paGes, X.orG, doxygen, anything with gettext, GIMP, anything -ng, or any pluGins. Don't even talk to me about grep. ;) - Andrei "*G*aroth" Thorp

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-24 Thread Jan de Groot
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 23:01 +0300, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > > gconf only depends on orbit2>=2.14.17 gtk2>=2.16.0 libxml2>=2.7.3 > policykit>=0.9 libldap>=2.3.43 > It has no dependencies on "ugly" gnome libs (libgnome, libbonobo) so > non > gnome users shouldn't have problem with it. But it has

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-24 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:33 +0200, JM wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:17 +0200, JM wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:48 +0200, JM wrote: > >> >> Hello, > >> >> > >> >> I noti

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-23 Thread JM
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:17 +0200, JM wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: >> > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:48 +0200, JM wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that rea

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-23 Thread Jan de Groot
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:17 +0200, JM wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:48 +0200, JM wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really > >> necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-23 Thread JM
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:48 +0200, JM wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really >> necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-agnostic applications >> such as Midori (through its depe

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-03-30 Thread Jan de Groot
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:48 +0200, JM wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really > necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-agnostic applications > such as Midori (through its dependency on libwebkit) or hardinfo (currently > in AUR). > > R

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-03-30 Thread JM
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > JM wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really > > necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-agnostic applications > > such as Midori (through its dependency on libwebki

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-03-30 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
JM wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really > necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-agnostic applications > such as Midori (through its dependency on libwebkit) or hardinfo (currently > in AUR). > > Regards, > JM > > Hi, There are tw

[arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-03-30 Thread JM
Hello, I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-agnostic applications such as Midori (through its dependency on libwebkit) or hardinfo (currently in AUR). Regards, JM