> Those are AUR packages, you need to ask their maintainers in the AUR to
> make the necessary changes.
Learn2read, please. I was given the impression that this was going to
be solved with the python package:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>Hmm... I probably should have adde
On 20-10-2010 05:35, Angus wrote:
>>> Hmm... I probably should have added a version to the provides line in the
>>> python package. Currently it only provides "python3" and not a version so
>>> the versioned deps in those AUR packages are causing issues. I'll get
>>> around to that before this
>> Hmm... I probably should have added a version to the provides line in the
>> python package. Currently it only provides "python3" and not a version so
>> the versioned deps in those AUR packages are causing issues. I'll get
>> around to that before this exits [testing]
>
> Um... did you
> Hmm... I probably should have added a version to the provides line in the
> python package. Currently it only provides "python3" and not a version so
> the versioned deps in those AUR packages are causing issues. I'll get
> around to that before this exits [testing]
Um... did you perhaps
> Hmm... I probably should have added a version to the provides line in the
> python package. Currently it only provides "python3" and not a version so
> the versioned deps in those AUR packages are causing issues. I'll get
> around to that before this exits [testing]
>
> Allan
>
Yes, that
On 07/10/10 14:59, Angus wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 07/10/10 14:40, Angus wrote:
I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3
being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to
'python3.x').
But what's the reason for no longer ha
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 07/10/10 14:40, Angus wrote:
>>
>> I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3
>> being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to
>> 'python3.x').
>>
>> But what's the reason for no longer having a package nam
On 07/10/10 14:40, Angus wrote:
I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3
being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to
'python3.x').
But what's the reason for no longer having a package named 'python3'
with a symlink to 'python3.x'? It would make (/have made
I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3
being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to
'python3.x').
But what's the reason for no longer having a package named 'python3'
with a symlink to 'python3.x'? It would make (/have made) the
transition a little easier,
9 matches
Mail list logo
