Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 and "empty" repos

2012-01-20 Thread Magnus Therning
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 13:30, Allan McRae wrote: [...] > touch /repo/repo.db Ah, how silly, I didn't try that. Indeed, it seems to work. /M -- Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org   jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe               http:

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 and "empty" repos

2012-01-20 Thread Baho Utot
On Friday 20 January 2012 07:30:53 am Allan McRae wrote: > On 20/01/12 22:11, Magnus Therning wrote: > > In ArchHaskell we are heavy users of mkarchroot/makechrootpkg for > > building packages. When setting up the root chroot pacman is > > configured with a local db located at `/repo`, this make

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 and "empty" repos

2012-01-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/01/12 22:11, Magnus Therning wrote: > In ArchHaskell we are heavy users of mkarchroot/makechrootpkg for > building packages. When setting up the root chroot pacman is > configured with a local db located at `/repo`, this makes already > built packages available as dependencies later on in a

[arch-general] pacman 4 and "empty" repos

2012-01-20 Thread Magnus Therning
In ArchHaskell we are heavy users of mkarchroot/makechrootpkg for building packages. When setting up the root chroot pacman is configured with a local db located at `/repo`, this makes already built packages available as dependencies later on in a multi-package build, and by using makechrootpkg's