Doug Newgard writes:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:51:16 +0100
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>> Doug Newgard writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:25:58 +0100
>> > Magnus Therning wrote:
>> >
>> >> Stefan Tatschner writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On 01.02.2016 23:05, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> >> >> Is
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 21:06:14 -0500
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 09:00 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> > Neither hooks.bin nor hooks.local are used by alpm/pacman in any way.
> > They are merely my own personal suggestions for where packages should
> > put scripts and inactive hooks. The intent
On 02/02/2016 09:00 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> Neither hooks.bin nor hooks.local are used by alpm/pacman in any way.
> They are merely my own personal suggestions for where packages should
> put scripts and inactive hooks. The intent for hooks.local is for
> packages to place any hooks that shoul
On 02/02/16 at 08:43pm, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 06:54 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > No, even those are for packages. Users/admins should use
> > /etc/pacman.d/hooks.
> > Not sure about scripts.
>
> I would guess that scripts can be put anywhere, I would probably just
> put them in the H
On 02/02/2016 06:54 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> No, even those are for packages. Users/admins should use /etc/pacman.d/hooks.
> Not sure about scripts.
I would guess that scripts can be put anywhere, I would probably just
put them in the HookDir (matching *.{hook,sh} files).
But why would anyone us
On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:51:16 +0100
Magnus Therning wrote:
> Doug Newgard writes:
>
> > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:25:58 +0100
> > Magnus Therning wrote:
> >
> >> Stefan Tatschner writes:
> >>
> >> > On 01.02.2016 23:05, Magnus Therning wrote:
> >> >> Is there more information about this fe
Doug Newgard writes:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:25:58 +0100
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>> Stefan Tatschner writes:
>>
>> > On 01.02.2016 23:05, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> >> Is there more information about this feature available somewhere?
>> >
>> > $ man 5 alpm-hooks
>>
>> Excellent. I als
On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:25:58 +0100
Magnus Therning wrote:
> Stefan Tatschner writes:
>
> > On 01.02.2016 23:05, Magnus Therning wrote:
> >> Is there more information about this feature available somewhere?
> >
> > $ man 5 alpm-hooks
>
> Excellent. I also found this https://github.com/andr
Stefan Tatschner writes:
> On 01.02.2016 23:05, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> Is there more information about this feature available somewhere?
>
> $ man 5 alpm-hooks
Excellent. I also found this https://github.com/andrewgregory/pachooks.
I'm guessing that link contains one erroneos bit of informat
Le 01/02/2016 23:05, Magnus Therning a écrit :
> I just noticed an email in this list mentioning that with pacman 5.0 we
> know have support for hooks. I proceeded to look at the man pages for
> /pacman/, /makepkg/, and /PKGBUILD/ but only found one mention of a
> /hookdir/.
>
> Is there more infor
Bruno Pagani writes:
> Le 01/02/2016 23:05, Magnus Therning a écrit :
>> I just noticed an email in this list mentioning that with pacman 5.0 we
>> know have support for hooks. I proceeded to look at the man pages for
>> /pacman/, /makepkg/, and /PKGBUILD/ but only found one mention of a
>> /hook
On 01.02.2016 23:05, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Is there more information about this feature available somewhere?
$ man 5 alpm-hooks
S
I just noticed an email in this list mentioning that with pacman 5.0 we
know have support for hooks. I proceeded to look at the man pages for
/pacman/, /makepkg/, and /PKGBUILD/ but only found one mention of a
/hookdir/.
Is there more information about this feature available somewhere?
/M
--
M
13 matches
Mail list logo
