Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-09 Thread Sander Jansen
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Peter Lewis wrote: > On Sunday 08 Jan 2012 19:12:57 Sander Jansen wrote: >> resolving dependencies... >> looking for inter-conflicts... >> error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) >> >> :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1 >> :: valgrind: r

Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-09 Thread Peter Lewis
On Sunday 08 Jan 2012 19:12:57 Sander Jansen wrote: > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) > > :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1 > :: valgrind: requires glibc<2.15 > > Any suggestions on how to fix this

Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 01/08/2012 08:55 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote: I occasionally get dependency errors when there is a pacman upgrade. I've gotten around it every single time by explicitly update pacman (pacman -S pacman), followed by my normal upgrade (pacman

Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Gergely Imreh
On 9 January 2012 12:24, Sander Jansen wrote: > On Jan 8, 2012 8:35 PM, "Qadri" wrote: >> >> > >> > resolving dependencies... >> > looking for inter-conflicts... >> > error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) >> > :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1 >> > :: valgrind: req

Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Sander Jansen
On Jan 8, 2012 8:35 PM, "Qadri" wrote: > > > > > resolving dependencies... > > looking for inter-conflicts... > > error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) > > :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1 > > :: valgrind: requires glibc<2.15 > > > > Any suggestions on how to fix t

Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote: > I occasionally get dependency errors when there is a pacman upgrade. I've > gotten around it every single time by explicitly update pacman (pacman -S > pacman), followed by my normal upgrade (pacman -Su) Do you have 'SyncFirst = pacman' in

Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 01/08/2012 06:12 PM, Sander Jansen wrote: :: Synchronizing package databases... testing 29.7 KiB 238K/s 00:00 [##] 100% core 102.1 KiB 296K/s 00:00 [##] 100% extra 1170.6 KiB 816K/s 00

Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Qadri
> > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) > :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1 > :: valgrind: requires glibc<2.15 > > Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict? > > Thanks, > > Sander > If you're okay wit

[arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Sander Jansen
:: Synchronizing package databases... testing 29.7 KiB 238K/s 00:00 [##] 100% core 102.1 KiB 296K/s 00:00 [##] 100% extra 1170.6 KiB 816K/s 00:01 [##] 100% community-testing