On 2/8/19 2:20 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> With the latest change to pambase, e.g.
>
> https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/pambase&id=3552aba772e8bebbe754a4d01f2729e291dd2070
>
> if you have services that rely on pam authentication, such as dovecot
Hi WorMzy,
> > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1831377 is a recent
> > thread on this pambase change causing problems. Apparently, I
> > hijacked it so it's now closed. But I'm pleased I did because
> > others that arrive there from Google, like I did, will now have the
> > trail I l
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:15:39AM -0500, Jens John wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, at 12:02, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> > I am sorry to ask this so late in the discussion, but why Arch default of
> > the
> > "other" module was insecure (and hence why the change)? Is there something
> >
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, at 12:02, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> I am sorry to ask this so late in the discussion, but why Arch default of the
> "other" module was insecure (and hence why the change)? Is there something
> wrong with pam_unix?
Not inherently. They implemented a suggestion from
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:54:22PM -0600, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:42:01 -0800
> frede...@ofb.net wrote:
>
> > I don't understand the need for that reaction...
>
> He posted that he's glad he broke the rules, implying that he'd gladly do it
> again in the futu
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:42:01 -0800
frede...@ofb.net wrote:
> I don't understand the need for that reaction...
He posted that he's glad he broke the rules, implying that he'd gladly do it
again in the future. A strong reaction is not only warranted, but necessary.
Scimmia
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 18:42 -0800, frede...@ofb.net wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:47:23PM +, WorMzy Tykashi via arch-general
> wrote:
> > To then try to pass this off as philanthropy is obscene.
> >
> > Don't be surprised if, the next time you pull this sort of stunt, you find
> > yours
I don't understand the need for that reaction...
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:47:23PM +, WorMzy Tykashi via arch-general wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 16:32, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1831377 is a recent thread
on this pambase change causing problems.
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 16:32, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1831377 is a recent thread
> on this pambase change causing problems. Apparently, I hijacked it so
> it's now closed. But I'm pleased I did because others that arrive there
> from Google, like I di
Hi Amish,
> David C. Rankin wrote:
> > if you have services that rely on pam authentication, such as
> > dovecot, etc.., you will find that your applications an no longer
> > authenticate using pam until you install a specific pam service in
> > /etc/pam.d for that application,
>
> Although this c
On 09/02/19 12:50 am, David C. Rankin wrote:
All,
With the latest change to pambase, e.g.
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/pambase&id=3552aba772e8bebbe754a4d01f2729e291dd2070
if you have services that rely on pam authentication, such as dovecot, etc.
All,
With the latest change to pambase, e.g.
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/pambase&id=3552aba772e8bebbe754a4d01f2729e291dd2070
if you have services that rely on pam authentication, such as dovecot, etc..,
you will find that your applications an no long
12 matches
Mail list logo
