On 05.03.2012 10:04, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Leonid Isaev on Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:32:45 -0600:
>> On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:56:43 +0100
>> Christian Hesse wrote:
>> > Ionut Biru on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:57:53 +0200:
>> > > On 03/04/2012 12:22 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
>> > > > I think it makes sense t
Leonid Isaev on Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:32:45 -0600:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:56:43 +0100
> Christian Hesse wrote:
>
> > Ionut Biru on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:57:53 +0200:
> > > On 03/04/2012 12:22 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > > > I think it makes sense to not allow pages related to package signing
> >
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:56:43 +0100
Christian Hesse wrote:
> Ionut Biru on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:57:53 +0200:
> > On 03/04/2012 12:22 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > > I think it makes sense to not allow pages related to package signing
> > > being delivered via http. Instead automatically redirect t
Ionut Biru on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:57:53 +0200:
> On 03/04/2012 12:22 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > I think it makes sense to not allow pages related to package signing being
> > delivered via http. Instead automatically redirect to https to avoid man
> > in the middle attacks. First site that com
On 03/04/2012 12:22 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> (As I am not allowed to post to arch-dev-public resending it here.)
>
> ok, not really related to the keyring package, but it came to my mind when
> installing it and while signing the key:
>
> I think it makes sense to not al
Hello everybody,
(As I am not allowed to post to arch-dev-public resending it here.)
ok, not really related to the keyring package, but it came to my mind when
installing it and while signing the key:
I think it makes sense to not allow pages related to package signing being
delivered via http.
6 matches
Mail list logo