Re: [arch-general] standards on AUR content

2012-05-11 Thread Ruslan Nabioullin
On 05/11/2012 12:33 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > Your email sounded like AUR is only used to provide software > documentation or books (except for non-free ones). I hope that's not > your intention, as it is not accurate. > > Rafael It is not my intention. I proposed guidelines which would apply to on

Re: [arch-general] standards on AUR content

2012-05-11 Thread rafael ff1
2012/5/11 Ruslan Nabioullin : > I believe that there should be more comprehensive, clear, and explicit > standards on what content is allowed to be installed by an AUR package. > There already exist two guidelines [1]: > > 1. usefulness: "Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want > to

[arch-general] standards on AUR content

2012-05-11 Thread Ruslan Nabioullin
I believe that there should be more comprehensive, clear, and explicit standards on what content is allowed to be installed by an AUR package. There already exist two guidelines [1]: 1. usefulness: "Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely special