Re: [arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Jakob Herrmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 02.10.2012 13:36, schrieb Heiko Baums: > And btw. ... > > So much about the very effective banning. Yes, I was indeed banned, > and like Allan told me, he wanted to ban me forever, because I sent > him a few comments on his banning. *rofl* > > Tha

Re: [arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Brandon Watkins
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Heiko Baums > wrote: > >> The way I read it is that the sort of problems you would typically > >> workaround with suspend hooks are best solved somewhere else, probably > >> in the kernel driver. > > [...] > >

Re: [arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: >> The way I read it is that the sort of problems you would typically >> workaround with suspend hooks are best solved somewhere else, probably >> in the kernel driver. [...] > Now the Linux kernel is blamed for the systemd insufficiencies and >

Re: [arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 02.10.2012 13:28, schrieb Heiko Baums: > Am Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:12:24 +0200 > schrieb Tom Gundersen : > >> The way I read it is that the sort of problems you would typically >> workaround with suspend hooks are best solved somewhere else, probably >> in the kernel driver. > > That's so typical

Re: [arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:28:40 +0200 schrieb Heiko Baums : > That's so typical for those Poetterix fanboys and developers. > > Firstly ALSA was blamed for the PulseAudio insufficiencies and bugs. > ALSA was blamed for PulseAudio not working with a lot of professional > audio and sound cards even if

Re: [arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:12:24 +0200 schrieb Tom Gundersen : > The way I read it is that the sort of problems you would typically > workaround with suspend hooks are best solved somewhere else, probably > in the kernel driver. That's so typical for those Poetterix fanboys and developers. Firstly AL

Re: [arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Mauro Santos
On 02-10-2012 11:12, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Mauro Santos > wrote: >> This seems to imply that a service file should be used, what I can't >> figure out from the documentation or google searches is how to implement >> the functionality I want with a .service file, o

Re: [arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Mauro Santos wrote: > This seems to imply that a service file should be used, what I can't > figure out from the documentation or google searches is how to implement > the functionality I want with a .service file, or if a service file is > actually needed/recommen

[arch-general] systemd, running scripts after suspend/hibernate

2012-10-02 Thread Mauro Santos
I have made the jump to systemd and I have been ironing a few things here and there, one of them is setting the HD advanced power management to a sane level to avoid excessive wear due to constant head parking. I've been able to achieve this by placing my script in /usr/lib/systemd/system-sleep, h