> OK, thanks both. I don't really have time to look into it properly, but now
> I
> know it's definitely something to do with my setup. I'll just let this one
> go
> for now.
I have a fedora system which I use for a task but I installed fedora on
awhile ago just to find out about systemd and
On Wednesday 22 Aug 2012 11:48:08 John K Pate wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:27:07 +0100
> I do, set up in the completely straightforward way:
>
> # systemctl enable systemd-readahead-collect.service
> # systemctl enable systemd-readahead-replay.service
>
> I didn't do anything special, and it w
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know if system-readahead is supposed to work in our current
> package? For me, there is an error message during boot (something about an
> event being too large to process), and there is no /.readahead file crea
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:27:07 +0100
Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know if system-readahead is supposed to work in our current
> package? For me, there is an error message during boot (something about an
> event being too large to process), and there is no /.readahead fil
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:39 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> system-readahead
Apologize, I'm a dyslexic :). read a head vs readhat for me :(. I'm
serious.
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 11:27 +0100, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know if system-readahead is supposed to work in our current
> package? For me, there is an error message during boot (something about an
> event being too large to process), and there is no /.readahead file
Hello all,
Does anyone know if system-readahead is supposed to work in our current
package? For me, there is an error message during boot (something about an
event being too large to process), and there is no /.readahead file created.
systemctl also reports a non-zero exit status, but no log
7 matches
Mail list logo