It's all good, man page has it listed as teapot but actual program is run
as teapot-planner and it runs too.
--
eneral Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] teapot package could be improved
>
> Jude,
>
> I managed to build teapot but setting LDFLAGS and CLAGS to correctly
> point to libtirpc. I also made some other minor improvements, and
> posted on the comments in t
Apr 2020 19:21:37
> > From: Jude DaShiell
> > Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> > Subject: Re: [arch-general] teapot package could be improved
> >
> > thanks, I will try to take teapot further and see wher
> Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] teapot package could be improved
>
> thanks, I will try to take teapot further and see where it crashes.
> This is keenerd's package if I'm not mu
:01:06
> From: Lone_Wolf
> Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> To: arch-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] teapot package could be improved
>
> Jude uses TalkingArch, logging in on AUR and adding comments may be near
> impossible.
>
>
> Jude, I&#x
Jude uses TalkingArch, logging in on AUR and adding comments may be near
impossible.
Jude, I've checked the files and it looks like teapot needs rpc/types.h
and rpc/xdr.h .
The libtirpc package has those files but installing it doesn't help.
The sourcecode for teapot is from 2012 and the pa
On 4/8/20 17:24, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> which package has the version of rpc.h teapot needs to build?
> Whichever package that is, the dependency is missing from the build
> script.
>
You should probably instead post this on the AUR package's comment
section, as it is an AUR package and the maint
which package has the version of rpc.h teapot needs to build?
Whichever package that is, the dependency is missing from the build
script.
--
8 matches
Mail list logo
