Re: [arch-general] Test Message for DMARC Checking (Please Ignore)

Thank you. On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:09 PM Florian Pritz wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:41:54PM +0100, Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general > wrote: > > Test Message > > If you just want to test if your DMARC verifier works, there are a few > possibilities listed here[1] under the "Message Va

Re: [arch-general] Test Message for DMARC Checking (Please Ignore)

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:41:54PM +0100, Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general wrote: > Test Message If you just want to test if your DMARC verifier works, there are a few possibilities listed here[1] under the "Message Validation" heading. These are probably more helpful that what you get from using

[arch-general] Test Message for DMARC Checking (Please Ignore)

Test Message -- Best Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-general] test - please ignore

Test. Please ignore -- Mário Figueiredo, Quiettech, Quiet Technologies Development Services and Research Phone: +351 214451247 Mobile: +351 926682351 Email: mario.figueir...@quiettech.org www.quiettech.org

[arch-general] test

Ignore it -- Ionuț

Re: [arch-general] test

Yea i was trying out gname. On 5/29/10, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote: > Armando M. Baratti wrote: >> @papul: >> If you're trying some sort of program (like an automatic troller, or >> something like this :-) on the list, you can test it on any normal mail >> account, the list will behave the same. >>

Re: [arch-general] test

Armando M. Baratti wrote: > @papul: > If you're trying some sort of program (like an automatic troller, or > something like this :-) on the list, you can test it on any normal mail > account, the list will behave the same. > Ah, but if he's using some sort of news-to-mail gateway (like gma

Re: [arch-general] test

On 28-05-2010 00:51, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, papul wrote: Sorry for this useless message. testing some service. You're send a test message to 500-1000 people on a mailing list. Idiotic. Create a mail account on another provider and test your thing. Don't

Re: [arch-general] test

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:21:07AM +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, papul wrote: > > Sorry for this useless message. testing some service. > > > > > > You're send a test message to 500-1000 people on a mailing list. > Idiotic. Create a mail account on another p

Re: [arch-general] test

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, papul wrote: > Sorry for this useless message. testing some service. > > You're send a test message to 500-1000 people on a mailing list. Idiotic. Create a mail account on another provider and test your thing. Don't annoy us. Mr. Aaron may ban you if you do this o

[arch-general] test

Sorry for this useless message. testing some service.

Re: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 17:51 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > 2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee : > > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote: > >> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 > >> > Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> > > >> >> Seems to work now :)

Re: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee : > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote: >> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 >> > Aaron Griffin wrote: >> > >> >> Seems to work now :) >> > >> > Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave

Re: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 > > Aaron Griffin wrote: > > > >> Seems to work now :) > > > > Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave > > me a ticking-off for prolon

Re: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 > Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> Seems to work now :) > > Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave > me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of > displeasure at its continuance. I wond

Re: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 Aaron Griffin wrote: > Seems to work now :) Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of displeasure at its continuance. I wondered if maybe I had been banned. Maybe I was. Maybe I shou

Re: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Geoff wrote: > Sorry to post a test message, but I am an infrequent poster > whose e-mails have not been getting through.  I wrote to > the list admins about it a while ago but got no response, so > I have unsubscribed / resubscribed. Seems to work now :)

[arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

Sorry to post a test message, but I am an infrequent poster whose e-mails have not been getting through. I wrote to the list admins about it a while ago but got no response, so I have unsubscribed / resubscribed.

Re: [arch-general] test

Aaron Griffin wrote: > Silly me for not reading the docs - that list is required.. hah ts ts ts, evil ]:->

Re: [arch-general] test

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> test >>> >> >> Roger that. I just received a dump of emails poste

Re: [arch-general] test

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> test >> > > Roger that. I just received a dump of emails posted over the last 12 hours. Yup. As I was fiddling with mailman, I noticed a list

Re: [arch-general] test

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> test >> > > Roger that. I just received a dump of emails posted over the last 12 hours. > what up ? kind of mail server down? -- Keep It Sim

Re: [arch-general] test

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > test > Roger that. I just received a dump of emails posted over the last 12 hours.

[arch-general] test

test

[arch-general] test

Re: [arch-general] test

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas X. Iverson wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> hi >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:16 PM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> tes

Re: [arch-general] test

Thomas X. Iverson wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:16 PM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test Welcome :) Stop replying to this It was obviously a test to see if the email

Re: [arch-general] test

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:16 PM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> test > > Welcome :) -- Keep It Simple Stupid http://blog.ghostunix.org ghosTM55

Re: [arch-general] test

hi On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:16 PM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > test >

[arch-general] test

test

Re: [arch-general] test

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > test I don't think it got through. You probably have to say "testing 1, 2, 3" before it works.

[arch-general] test

test -- Eric