On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:34:02PM +0530, gt wrote:
> Well, changing the termName to rxvt, has solved things for now. I know
> it's not good to force termNames, but i didn't see any other solution
> for now. Let's wait and see if this gives trouble or not.
Well i came up with a ridiculous idea, an
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:48:23PM +0100, Koen Wilde wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:21:55 +0530, gt wrote:
> > But, why only vim is displaying this behaviour is beyond me. If it's of
> > any use, i am attaching my vimrc.
>
> Did you try a different (256-color) vim color scheme?
I tried a 256 co
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:21:55 +0530, gt wrote:
> But, why only vim is displaying this behaviour is beyond me. If it's of
> any use, i am attaching my vimrc.
Did you try a different (256-color) vim color scheme?
cheers,
Koen
Well, changing the termName to rxvt, has solved things for now. I know
it's not good to force termNames, but i didn't see any other solution
for now. Let's wait and see if this gives trouble or not.
--
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:54:22PM +0530, gt wrote:
> > But, setting termName to rxvt-unicode-256color in .Xresources still
> > doesn't have any effect on non-screen terminals, i.e., no bold colours
> > still.
>
> With ur
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:54:22PM +0530, gt wrote:
> But, setting termName to rxvt-unicode-256color in .Xresources still
> doesn't have any effect on non-screen terminals, i.e., no bold colours
> still.
With urxvt, I don't specify the termName, it sets its default to
`rxvt-unicode-256color'. So,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:20:08AM -0500, nico wrote:
> Have you tried updating your machine? "$TERM too long - sorry" is a
> quite old bug, which has already been fixed for several months.
Hmm.. I was using screen-vs from aur. Just switched to screen from
extra and this bug is gone.
But, settin
Have you tried updating your machine? "$TERM too long - sorry" is a
quite old bug, which has already been fixed for several months.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 03:40:09PM +0100, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 08:44:14AM +0530, gt wrote:
> > I have been facing this issue from a long time. The issue is that
> > sometimes the bold colours aren't loaded by urxvt.
> >
> > I mainly use the terminals inside sc
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 08:44:14AM +0530, gt wrote:
> I have been facing this issue from a long time. The issue is that
> sometimes the bold colours aren't loaded by urxvt.
>
> I mainly use the terminals inside screen, and then the colours are
> loaded properly (not always though). But when launch
Hello folks
I have been facing this issue from a long time. The issue is that
sometimes the bold colours aren't loaded by urxvt.
I mainly use the terminals inside screen, and then the colours are
loaded properly (not always though). But when launching the terminal
standalone, the colours aren't l
11 matches
Mail list logo
