Re: [arch-general] vim runtime woes

2010-05-14 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote: The vim runtime that can be retrieved via rsync is outdated. Some of the patches modify the runtime, and some of these changes (e.g. 394) are lost when the runtime is overwritten with the runtime from rsync. Not

Re: [arch-general] vim runtime woes

2010-05-14 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote: The vim runtime that can be retrieved via rsync is outdated. Some of the patches modify the runtime, and some of these changes (e.g. 394) are lost when the runtime is overwritten with the runtime from rsync. Not

Re: [arch-general] vim runtime woes

2010-05-14 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote: The vim runtime that can be retrieved via rsync is outdated. Some of the patches modify the runtime, and some of these changes (e.g. 394)

Re: [arch-general] vim runtime woes

2010-05-14 Thread Jan Steffens
I'll edit the PKGBUILD, then. Should I submit it as a bug again? On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com

Re: [arch-general] vim runtime woes

2010-05-14 Thread Firmicus
On 14/05/2010 21:09, Xavier Chantry wrote: Just in case people think this is a theoretical problem no one cares about ... solving this would give us tar.xz support that comes with latest version of gzip plugin : http://code.google.com/p/vim/source/browse/runtime/plugin/gzip.vim Never opened a

Re: [arch-general] vim runtime woes

2010-05-14 Thread Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
On 05/14/10 at 09:34pm, Jan Steffens wrote: I'll edit the PKGBUILD, then. Should I submit it as a bug again? On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010

Re: [arch-general] vim runtime woes

2010-05-14 Thread Jan Steffens
The tags only go up to v7-2-325. Newer versions are untagged. :( On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com

[arch-general] vim runtime woes

2010-05-13 Thread Jan Steffens
The vim runtime that can be retrieved via rsync is outdated. Some of the patches modify the runtime, and some of these changes (e.g. 394) are lost when the runtime is overwritten with the runtime from rsync. Not using the runtime from rsync at all also misses some updates. Any thoughts on how