Re: [arch-general] virt-manager empty package?

Try this http://sl1pkn07.wtf/paste/view/0b3c7db2 is for my personal use, need modification to sync with repos (damm you, gconf) greetings

Re: [arch-general] virt-manager empty package?

> The virt-manager executable is > shipped with virt-install. The packages should contain the respective > executables. It's easier/simpler to just add desktop deps with a separate package like this. The problem is that upstream doesn't separate desktop and console packages.

Re: [arch-general] virt-manager empty package?

Hey, there is apparently a problem with this package (PKGBUILD). The bug mentioned in #43881 regarding the split package suggested to split the packages with their executables. And this is not happening. virt-manager has no files in it, just dependency. The virt-manager executable is shipped with

Re: [arch-general] virt-manager empty package?

2015-12-25 13:25 GMT+01:00 Sebastiaan Lokhorst : > It can't be right that this PKGBUILD[1] produces a completely empty > package. > Okay, apparently it is. *https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43881 *

Re: [arch-general] virt-manager empty package?

It can't be right that this PKGBUILD[1] produces a completely empty package. I have filed a bug.[2] [1] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/virt-manager [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47527 2015-12-25 3:49 GMT+01:00 Neven Sajko : > virt-insta

Re: [arch-general] virt-manager empty package?

virt-install is just for console usage, as is indicated in its package description, and virt-manager package adds and sets up dependencies needed for desktop parts of virt-manager.

[arch-general] virt-manager empty package?

Does anyone know why virt-manager is an empty package? The package depends on virt-install which contains the virt-manager program, and just adds its dependencies. Is this intentional? The PKGBUILD suggests it tries to do something. -- damjan