On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 02:26:39 +0100
Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Griffin
aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh shit, seriously? Looks like I'll have to rebuild this as well.
Serious question: does ANYONE have a keyboard that didn't
automatically
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:40 +0100, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 02:26:39 +0100
Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway hal is dead :
http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2009/Notes?highlight=%28hal%29|%28udev%29#head-754e4968dd043dcf2166dff61afd7d0d06c5
But since that
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:58:20 +0100
Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
nope. The hal crap has been added to X a while ago as optional
(meaning X would just freeze without it, but at least pretend to
start)
,
obviously i do NOT want to remove xorg-server.
i don't need evdev, but:
:: xorg-server: requires xf86-input-evdev=2.2.5
so no removing it either.
the mirror i'm using has been updated today (December 1th), and i'm not
using testing.
mirrors package versions:
xorg-server 1.7.2-2
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 12:43 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
obviously i do NOT want to remove xorg-server.
i don't need evdev, but:
:: xorg-server: requires xf86-input-evdev=2.2.5
so no removing it either.
the mirror i'm using has been updated today (December 1th), and i'm not
using
On 12/01/2009 01:43 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
obviously i do NOT want to remove xorg-server.
i don't need evdev, but:
:: xorg-server: requires xf86-input-evdev=2.2.5
so no removing it either.
the mirror i'm using has been updated today (December 1th), and i'm not
using testing.
mirrors package
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 12:43 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
obviously i do NOT want to remove xorg-server.
i don't need evdev, but:
:: xorg-server: requires xf86-input-evdev=2.2.5
so no removing it either.
the mirror i'm using has been updated today (December 1th), and i'm not
Arvid Picciani wrote:
warning: cannot resolve hal=0.5.13, a dependency of xorg-server
never mind my bitching. rebuilding xorg-server without hal was a matter
of abs,edit,makepkg
3 arch
--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies
2009/12/1 Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
warning: cannot resolve hal=0.5.13, a dependency of xorg-server
never mind my bitching. rebuilding xorg-server without hal was a matter of
abs,edit,makepkg
3 arch
Are you using -Syu or are you trying to just randomly -S
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
warning: cannot resolve hal=0.5.13, a dependency of xorg-server
never mind my bitching. rebuilding xorg-server without hal was a
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/12/1 Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
warning: cannot resolve hal=0.5.13, a dependency of
Aaron,
Oh shit, seriously? Looks like I'll have to rebuild this as well.
It's your distro. I fail to see the whole reason why you have always
been in support of KISS and the arch way, but never seem to take action
to enforce it. Maybe it's something social, which i tend to be ignorant
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
Aaron,
Oh shit, seriously? Looks like I'll have to rebuild this as well.
It's your distro. I fail to see the whole reason why you have always been in
support of KISS and the arch way, but never seem to take action to enforce
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
nope. The hal crap has been added to X a while ago as optional
(meaning X would just freeze without it, but at least pretend to
start)
, but the forced dependency is new (as in, it doesnt start when
compiled
with hal, but no hal
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
nope. The hal crap has been added to X a while ago as optional
(meaning X would just freeze without it, but at least pretend to
start)
, but the forced dependency is new (as in, it doesnt start when
compiled
with
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh shit, seriously? Looks like I'll have to rebuild this as well.
Serious question: does ANYONE have a keyboard that didn't
automatically work before this debacle? External keyboard always Just
Worked without
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
I have yet to see someone serious and informed saying input hotplug
sucks. All xorg developers I have seen (on the web : ML, blogs, irc,
...) seem to agree this new infrastructure is much better.
Just to be clear, I am one of
Why is hal dead?
More information on this and on libudev?
Vlad
--
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:57 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
I have yet to see someone serious and informed saying input hotplug
sucks. All xorg developers I have seen (on the web : ML, blogs, irc,
...) seem to agree this new
19 matches
Mail list logo
