On Jan 8, 2008 5:35 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> This file is not contained in the nvidia-utils package, which means you
> previously used the nvidia installer to install the driver.
I've been using the arch package without any problems for a while now, and
didn't have any
Varun Acharya schrieb:
> Same conflict error for me brain0, (x86_64)
Of course, it was a mistake in the old package version .
> 2: /usr/lib64/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.1 [0x2ba54cddd65e]
This file is not contained in the nvidia-utils package, which means you
previously used the nvidia installer to in
Same conflict error for me brain0, (x86_64)
error: could not prepare transaction
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
nvidia-utils: /usr/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1 exists in filesystem
But more importantly, X fails to start up... here are the last few lines
from Xorg.0.log
Hello out there
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:11:34 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> I added new nvidia drivers 169.07 for i686 and x86_64 to testing. My
> nvidia machine is out of order for now, so please sign off both
> architectures and as many GPUs as possible.
>
> I am also interested in signoffs
Jesse Young schrieb:
> everything looks fine on i686, except for this error on upgrade,
> I don't know how pacman lost track of it, unless I was installinng
> my own nvidia* a long time ago.
> nvidia-utils: /usr/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1 exists in filesystem
This is a symlink that was created
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:11:34 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> I added new nvidia drivers 169.07 for i686 and x86_64 to testing. My
> nvidia machine is out of order for now, so please sign off both
> architectures and as many GPUs as possible.
>
> I am also interested in signoffs from users, so p
6 matches
Mail list logo
