Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-03-01 Thread Allan McRae
On 02/03/11 09:54, Jelle van der Waa wrote: On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:54 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 22:31 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:23 +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 28/02/11 09:58,

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-03-01 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:54 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 22:31 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:23 +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > > > On 28/02/11 09:58, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-03-01 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 22:31 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:23 +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > > On 28/02/11 09:58, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > >> > > >> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 17:06 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-03-01 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:23 +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 28/02/11 09:58, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 17:06 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > > >>

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-28 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 28/02/11 09:58, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 17:06 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Loui Chang  wrote: On Sun 27 Feb 2011 12:01 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > > On Sat, Feb

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-28 Thread Allan McRae
On 28/02/11 09:58, Jelle van der Waa wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 17:06 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sun 27 Feb 2011 12:01 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: Maj

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-27 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 17:06 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > > On Sun 27 Feb 2011 12:01 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > >> > On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Major upstream updat

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-27 Thread Dan McGee
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > On Sun 27 Feb 2011 12:01 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> > On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> >> >> Major upstream update. >> >> >> >> Test well. There is no soname bump, but experience

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-27 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-02-27 16:04:26 -0500] Loui Chang: > Rebuild won't do it. tig wants to create zero sized windows which > newwin() doesn't allow anymore. We could patch it with some arbitrary > size which kind of works, The oping program (from liboping in [community]) was doing the same, so I patched it like

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-27 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 12:01 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: > >> > >> Major upstream update. > >> > >> Test well. There is no soname bump, but experience tells me that some > >> rebuilds will probably be required

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-27 Thread Allan McRae
On 27/02/11 19:49, Evgeny Burmentyev wrote: On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:33:32PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: On 27/02/11 18:38, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Allan McRae wrote: On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: Major upstream update. Test well. There is no sonam

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-27 Thread Evgeny Burmentyev
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:33:32PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 27/02/11 18:38, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > >On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > >>On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: > >>> > >>>Major upstream update. > >>> > >>>Test well. There is no soname bump, but experience

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-27 Thread Allan McRae
On 27/02/11 18:38, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Allan McRae wrote: On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: Major upstream update. Test well. There is no soname bump, but experience tells me that some rebuilds will probably be required to fix minor issues. just FTR

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

2011-02-27 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> Major upstream update. >> >> Test well. There is no soname bump, but experience tells me that some >> rebuilds will probably be required to fix minor issues. just FTR, it breaks rtorrent. eb64@drama