Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-20 Thread Kaiting Chen
2012/3/21 Bartłomiej Piotrowski > On 03/20/2012 10:28 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote: > > > > Oh never mind that's taken, I could take bzr, proftpd, openbabel, and > vim. > > Out of these avogadro which is in [extra] depends on openbabel. > > Surprisingly the only non-vim package that depends on vim is a

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-20 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 03/20/2012 10:28 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote: > > Oh never mind that's taken, I could take bzr, proftpd, openbabel, and vim. > Out of these avogadro which is in [extra] depends on openbabel. > Surprisingly the only non-vim package that depends on vim is archboot and > that is in [extra]. Which means

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-20 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:28:25 -0400 Kaiting Chen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Lukas Fleischer > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-20 Thread Kaiting Chen
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> > > Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrieb Lukas Fl

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-20 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Kaiting Chen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > > > Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrie

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-20 Thread Kaiting Chen
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > > Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > > > > Apart from that, +1 to this idea. I already che

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-20 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > > > Apart from that, +1 to this idea. I already checked the list of unneeded > > > orphans and there's >20 packages

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-06 Thread Rémy Oudompheng
Le 5 mars 2012 16:40, Lukas Fleischer a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: >> > Apart from that, +1 to this idea. I already checked the list of unneeded >> > orphans and there's >20 packages I'd like to maintai

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-06 Thread Giovanni Scafora
Il 06/03/2012 11:12, Jelle van der Waa ha scritto: If python-lxml is orphan in [extra] (it looks like it accordign to archweb) , i would like to adopt it in [community] and add python3 support. translate-toolkit requires python-lxml, so I think that python-lxml should be in [extra] or moving b

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-06 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Guillaume Alaux wrote: > On 5 March 2012 21:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:49:57PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Lukas Fleischer > > > wrote: > > > > * bluez-firmware > > > > > > I take this one.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-05 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 5 March 2012 21:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:49:57PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Lukas Fleischer > > wrote: > > > * bluez-firmware > > > > I take this one. > > Thanks! > > > > > > * lzo > > > > If nothing is depending on this, it

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:49:57PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > > * bluez-firmware > > I take this one. Thanks! > > > * lzo > > If nothing is depending on this, it might simply mean that all users > have moved to lzo2 and that lzo ca

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-05 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > * bluez-firmware I take this one. > * lzo If nothing is depending on this, it might simply mean that all users have moved to lzo2 and that lzo can be dropped. > I'm not sure about lirc either, I'd prefer if someone could adopt both > lir

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > > Apart from that, +1 to this idea. I already checked the list of unneeded > > orphans and there's >20 packages I'd like to maintain if they aren't > > picked up in [extra]... > > Send

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-04 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 24.02.2012 16:45, schrieb Bartłomiej Piotrowski: > On 02/24/2012 04:19 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> * If a TU wants to maintain an orphan that is currently in [extra], >> please let us know. > > Then if you could move following packages to [community], I'd be glad to > take them: > * gftp > * m

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-03-04 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > Apart from that, +1 to this idea. I already checked the list of unneeded > orphans and there's >20 packages I'd like to maintain if they aren't > picked up in [extra]... Send me a list of these packages. But ensure they are still orphan and are not a

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-02-24 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:19:25PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Hi all, > > while the rebuild of unsigned packages is about to be finished we > should start to think about our orphaned packages. ATM there about 430 > of them in core and extra 1); some of them are 8probably) not needed by > any o

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

2012-02-24 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 02/24/2012 04:19 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > * If a TU wants to maintain an orphan that is currently in [extra], > please let us know. Then if you could move following packages to [community], I'd be glad to take them: * gftp * midori * orage * ristretto * pwgen * vsftpd -- Bartłomiej Piotrow