Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Python rebuild on its way to [testing]

2010-10-04 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/10/10 09:02, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 20:14 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:01:03 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Just a question on this topic - does the new [staging] mean that [testing] should always be complete (ie. not having any unupdated-for-lib-bump packa

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Python rebuild on its way to [testing]

2010-10-04 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 20:14 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:01:03 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee > wrote: > > Just a question on this topic - does the new [staging] mean that > > [testing] should always be complete (ie. not having any > > unupdated-for-lib-bump packages)? > > Yes, that wa

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Python rebuild on its way to [testing]

2010-10-04 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:01:03 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Just a question on this topic - does the new [staging] mean that > [testing] should always be complete (ie. not having any > unupdated-for-lib-bump packages)? Yes, that was the whole idea; to not break or freeze testing intentionally. -- Pi

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Python rebuild on its way to [testing]

2010-10-04 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
Just a question on this topic - does the new [staging] mean that [testing] should always be complete (ie. not having any unupdated-for-lib-bump packages)?