Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Strange behaviour of pacman

2009-10-23 Thread Pierre Chapuis
Le Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:13:33 -0500, Aaron Griffin a écrit : > >> > I have found a way to automate that which is, I believe, not > >> > PKGBUILD-dependant. > >> > > >> > Here's what I do in the PKGBUILD: > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > install="pyo_remover.install" > >> > [...] > >> > build() { > >> >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Strange behaviour of pacman

2009-10-22 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > Le Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:02:53 -0500, > Aaron Griffin a écrit : > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Pierre Chapuis wrote: >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:48:58 +1000, >> > Allan McRae wrote: >> > >> >> Jan de Groot wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 2009

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Strange behaviour of pacman

2009-10-22 Thread Pierre Chapuis
Le Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:02:53 -0500, Aaron Griffin a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:48:58 +1000, > > Allan McRae wrote: > > > >> Jan de Groot wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 15:18 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> > > >> >> Are you

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Strange behaviour of pacman

2009-10-22 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:48:58 +1000, > Allan McRae wrote: > >> Jan de Groot wrote: >> > On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 15:18 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> > >> >> Are you saying that the .pyo files are no longer architecture >> >> independent? I was

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Strange behaviour of pacman

2009-10-22 Thread Pierre Chapuis
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:48:58 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 15:18 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > > >> Are you saying that the .pyo files are no longer architecture > >> independent? I was under the assumption they were. > >> > > > > Actually, th