Re: [arch-general] Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4

2010-03-16 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 14:41:41 Nathan Wayde wrote: > On 16/03/10 00:48, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > [...] > > But as far as file system performance goes, the overhead should be > > identical for both the runs, no? > > I'm not too sure about that. I'm guessing there is less seeking going on >

Re: [arch-general] Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4

2010-03-16 Thread Nathan Wayde
On 16/03/10 00:48, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: [...] But as far as file system performance goes, the overhead should be identical for both the runs, no? I'm not too sure about that. I'm guessing there is less seeking going on with Btrfs. Some files systems (reiserfs + reiserfs4 IIRC) are very go

Re: [arch-general] Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4

2010-03-15 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Monday 15 March 2010 15:44:35 Nathan Wayde wrote: > On 13/03/10 03:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today. > > > > Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt > > Maybe you're looking for http://docs.python.org/library/f

Re: [arch-general] Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4

2010-03-15 Thread Nathan Wayde
On 13/03/10 03:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: Hi, Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today. Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt Maybe you're looking for http://docs.python.org/library/filecmp.html One cannot help but think that you took a disk-bound process an

Re: [arch-general] Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4

2010-03-14 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 03/13/2010 08:35 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: Hi, Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today. Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt Great. A stable version released ? -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site & Server Adminstrator www.itech7.com