On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59:20AM +0100, Ondřej Kučera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 7.3.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
> >LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
> >OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>
> I have a small concern. I regula
Hello,
On 7.3.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
I have a small concern. I regularly need to do a batch conversion of ODS
files to CSV. For a long time I've
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 01:33 +0100, Linas wrote:
> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Dedicated to the relatively-closed and more-constrained version of whats
> > in the repos. Sure =)
> >
> > The distros have jumped fast, but I'm wondering about the Windows users
> > of openoffice, seems to me none of them would
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> Dedicated to the relatively-closed and more-constrained version of whats
> in the repos. Sure =)
>
> The distros have jumped fast, but I'm wondering about the Windows users
> of openoffice, seems to me none of them would try libreoffice just
> because its there (and frankly the p
On Mar 10, 2011 10:04am, Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti
wrote:
I switched to LibreOffice as soon as it hit the repos and I don't miss a
thing.
Also, I don't think we should worry too much about users coming from
Windows. Really, if they're here, they're not afraid of change.
Drop it now!
I switched to LibreOffice as soon as it hit the repos and I don't miss a thing.
Also, I don't think we should worry too much about users coming from
Windows. Really, if they're here, they're not afraid of change.
Drop it now!
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 02:01:25 -0500 (EST) Jude DaShiell wrote:
> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
> oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground
> area
Before doing this i suggest to name it:
needless_sh**_for_non_latex_users_bought_from_the_dar
Am Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:29:18 -0500 (EST)
schrieb Jude DaShiell :
> So as long as the libriopenoffice is in (o) other packages having a
> need for some flavor of openoffice depending on arch-linux
> dependencies policy would take the official packages first. If
> that's the case such naming convent
So as long as the libriopenoffice is in (o) other packages having a need
for some flavor of openoffice depending on arch-linux dependencies policy
would take the official packages first. If that's the case such naming
conventions would be unnecessary.On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, ??? wrote:
> 2011/3/9 J
2011/3/9 Thomas Dziedzic :
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using
>> arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages
>> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
>> oracle-openoffice-unsu
2011/3/9 Jude DaShiell :
> For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using
> arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages
> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
> oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground area
> where uns
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using
> arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages
> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
> oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has
For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using
arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages
libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground area
where unsupported packages go within its
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 10:22 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> 2011/3/7 Ng Oon-Ee :
> > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> >> just an fyi,
> >> openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to
> >> the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of
2011/3/7 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> just an fyi,
>> openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to
>> the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of how long it
>> takes to compile from source. + libreoffice is just a
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> just an fyi,
> openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to
> the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of how long it
> takes to compile from source. + libreoffice is just a better version
> of openof
+1 I see common sense in arch!! :)
On 8 March 2011 07:04, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> You should know replacing Oracle OpenOffice also does the accessibility
> crowd that uses orca a huge favor too. The Libri OpenOffice packages work
> better with Orca in several versions and don't crash because orca
You should know replacing Oracle OpenOffice also does the accessibility
crowd that uses orca a huge favor too. The Libri OpenOffice packages work
better with Orca in several versions and don't crash because orca is
running on the systems.On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 07.03
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>
> First my time is limited. I've asked so many times for help in the
> Office packaging area and nob
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> On 07.03.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
>>> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
>>> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages fro
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 07.03.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
>> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
>> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>>
>> First my time is limited. I've asked so many
On 07.03.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>
> First my time is limited. I've asked so many times for help in the
> Office packaging area and nobody stepped
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Squall Lionheart
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
>
>> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
>> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>>
>> First my time is limited. I've
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>
> First my time is limited. I've asked so many times for help in the
> Office packaging area and n
24 matches
Mail list logo
