Thanks for all the quick replies!
I was actually missing base-devel ^_^
2010/2/24 gt codere...@gmail.com
Wow did all of you post simultaneously ;)
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Michishige Kaito
chris.webs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is
On 02/24/2010 01:11 AM, Michishige Kaito wrote:
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
quick apt-cache search
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:11:12PM +, Michishige Kaito wrote:
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
quick
On Feb 23, 2010, at 18:11, Michishige Kaito chris.webs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers
for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is
On Tue 23 Feb 2010 23:11 +, Michishige Kaito wrote:
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
quick apt-cache
On 24.02.2010 00:11, Michishige Kaito wrote:
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
quick apt-cache search
Wow did all of you post simultaneously ;)
8 matches
Mail list logo