On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 11:01 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Baho Utot
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/14/2012 08:53 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
> On Wed, A
On 08/15/2012 11:01 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/14/2012 08:53 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 AM, David Benfell
wrote:
Does systemd not use the standard
mount p
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> though they may very well just keep chugging on,
>> pretending all is well.
>
> Very last post on systemd as you've said this before and I chose not to
> respond.
>
> No, they will throw a decriptive or general error and do what the scrip
> though they may very well just keep chugging on,
> pretending all is well.
Very last post on systemd as you've said this before and I chose not to
respond.
No, they will throw a decriptive or general error and do what the script
author intended which could be sub routines, traps which could be
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 08:53 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 AM, David Benfell
>>> wrote:
Does systemd not use the standard
mount program and follow /et
On 08/15/2012 09:30 AM, Christoph Vigano wrote:
I could not fix the systems as I could not get
a "recovery" bash prompt. I had to use a boot live CD to edit the fstab
and then all was well. On all my sysvinit systems a bad mount point
would just give me an error and continue booting.
Wouldn't
I could not fix the systems as I could not get
> a "recovery" bash prompt. I had to use a boot live CD to edit the fstab
> and then all was well. On all my sysvinit systems a bad mount point
> would just give me an error and continue booting.
Wouldn't it have been easier to just start with init=/
On 08/14/2012 08:53 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 AM, David Benfell
wrote:
Does systemd not use the standard
mount program and follow /etc/fstab?
It does. Though it does not use "mount -a", but rather mounts each fs
se
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Shridhar Daithankar
wrote:
> tell systemd not to use fsck on btrfs partition? Something like this?(pasted
> from my fstab)
>
> /dev/sda1 /data btrfs noatime,flushoncommit,defaults 0 0
>
>
> Does that help?
Thanks for this, will try it out with systemd (not right n
On Aug 15, 2012 2:53 AM, "Oon-Ee Ng" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 AM, David Benfell
> > wrote:
> >> Does systemd not use the standard
> >> mount program and follow /etc/fstab?
> >
> > It does. Though it does not use "mount -a",
On Wednesday 15 Aug 2012 8:53:37 AM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> Do I need to do something additional to get systemd to 'give up'
> partitions totally?
tell systemd not to use fsck on btrfs partition? Something like this?(pasted
from my fstab)
/dev/sda1 /data btrfs noatime,flushoncommit,defaults 0 0
Do
11 matches
Mail list logo
