Re: [arch-general] Systemd and startx

2012-09-23 Thread Mauro Santos
On 23-09-2012 19:38, Arno Gaboury wrote: > I went straight to systemd, and nothing exploded on my face! Do not be > scared, far from being so complex at it seems to. I wasn't expecting anything to explode, it's just my policy to do things in small incremental steps and use test subjects first if p

Re: [arch-general] Systemd and startx

2012-09-23 Thread Arno Gaboury
On 23/09/12||18:50, Mauro Santos wrote: > On 23-09-2012 18:38, Arno Gaboury wrote: > > On 23/09/12||18:16, Mauro Santos wrote: > >> So far I am only testing how systemd behaves in my system and what > >> changes I need to do before I permanently make the switch. > >> > >> So far the first problem,

Re: [arch-general] Systemd and startx

2012-09-23 Thread Mauro Santos
On 23-09-2012 18:38, Arno Gaboury wrote: > On 23/09/12||18:16, Mauro Santos wrote: >> So far I am only testing how systemd behaves in my system and what >> changes I need to do before I permanently make the switch. >> >> So far the first problem, which doesn't seem to be covered in the wiki, >> for

Re: [arch-general] Systemd and startx

2012-09-23 Thread Arno Gaboury
On 23/09/12||18:16, Mauro Santos wrote: > So far I am only testing how systemd behaves in my system and what > changes I need to do before I permanently make the switch. > > So far the first problem, which doesn't seem to be covered in the wiki, > forum or google searches, is that if I switch to a