On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 21:27, Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 Dec 2011 01:36:35 Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> > [2011-12-20 19:38:19 +0530] Keshav P R:
> > > error: rekonq: key "22AD5874F39D989F" is unknown
> > > error: key "22AD5874F39D989F" could not be looked up remotely
>
> I opened a bug abou
On Wednesday 21 Dec 2011 03:15:58 Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-12-20 15:57:02 +] Peter Lewis:
> > I have my master key stored offline, and I hope it will last forever
>
> I see. It's just to bad that it is only 1024-bit long... RSA and DSA
> keys of this length will probably be crackable in te
[2011-12-20 15:57:02 +] Peter Lewis:
> Did this:
>
> % pacman-key -r 22AD5874F39D989F
>
> not work for you?
It seems like it does, but my ugly script had already imported your key.
--
Gaetan
[2011-12-20 15:57:02 +] Peter Lewis:
> I have my master key stored offline, and I hope it will last forever
I see. It's just to bad that it is only 1024-bit long... RSA and DSA
keys of this length will probably be crackable in ten/fifteen years.
(And I'm sure the NSA can already do it.)
--
G
On Wednesday 21 Dec 2011 01:36:35 Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-12-20 19:38:19 +0530] Keshav P R:
> > error: rekonq: key "22AD5874F39D989F" is unknown
> > error: key "22AD5874F39D989F" could not be looked up remotely
I opened a bug about this a couple of days ago: FS#27612.
> This seems to be Pete
[2011-12-20 20:36:02 +0530] Keshav P R:
> Now that I have refreshed the list of keys. How should I import them all?
You are confusing a bit of everything.
There are two ways to get the new keys into your pacman keyring:
- let pacman download them when you install packages signed by them;
- run my
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 20:25, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-12-20 20:19:13 +0530] Keshav P R:
> > There seems to be many new User IDs and Signatures. Should I do
> "pacman-key
> > --refresh-keys" periodically?
>
> Actually, `--refresh-keys` will only update signatures; to get the new
> keys you m
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 20:20, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto <
denisfalqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Keshav P R
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I am unable to upgrade community/rekonq from 0.8.0-1 to 0.8.1-1
> > due to
> >
> > error: rekonq: key "22AD5874F39D989F" is unkn
[2011-12-20 20:19:13 +0530] Keshav P R:
> There seems to be many new User IDs and Signatures. Should I do "pacman-key
> --refresh-keys" periodically?
Actually, `--refresh-keys` will only update signatures; to get the new
keys you must either import them from pacman as you install packages
signed b
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Keshav P R
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am unable to upgrade community/rekonq from 0.8.0-1 to 0.8.1-1
> due to
>
> error: rekonq: key "22AD5874F39D989F" is unknown
> error: key "22AD5874F39D989F" could not be looked up remotely
> error: failed to commit transactio
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 20:06, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-12-20 19:38:19 +0530] Keshav P R:
> > error: rekonq: key "22AD5874F39D989F" is unknown
> > error: key "22AD5874F39D989F" could not be looked up remotely
>
> This seems to be Peter Lewis signing with (one of his many) subkeys...
> (Not su
[2011-12-20 19:38:19 +0530] Keshav P R:
> error: rekonq: key "22AD5874F39D989F" is unknown
> error: key "22AD5874F39D989F" could not be looked up remotely
This seems to be Peter Lewis signing with (one of his many) subkeys...
(Not sure why he does that.)
Do `gpg --recv-key E19DAA50` (primary ID)
On 02/25/2010 02:24 AM, John Black wrote:
I can not use TeamSpeak (32bit) and asking for 64 did nothing, this has
been requested for years. Hopefully the new beta will make a difference.
Skype will not work either and I am sure plenty of people have requested
a 64bit version but what do they care
Brendan Long wrote:
On 02/20/2010 04:23 AM, John Black wrote:
64bit support for proprietary software, on Linux, is disgustingly bad.
Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
bit programs..
That is what I did and I could get everything to work except microphone in
On Sunday 21 February 2010 04:35:51 Heiko Baums wrote:
> Btw., I don't see any good reasons why developers of proprietary
> software couldn't build x86_64 packages. They should only need to
> compile their software a second time.
Assuming the software is 64 bit clean. Thats a lot to assume!
--
Re
On 02/20/2010 04:03 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:25:11 -0700
> schrieb Brendan Long :
>
>
>> Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
>> bit programs..
>>
> No, it can't. This is only possible with multilib (lib32-*) support. So
> you need to
Am Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:25:11 -0700
schrieb Brendan Long :
> Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
> bit programs..
Btw., I don't see any good reasons why developers of proprietary
software couldn't build x86_64 packages. They should only need to
compile their softw
Am Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:25:11 -0700
schrieb Brendan Long :
> Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
> bit programs..
No, it can't. This is only possible with multilib (lib32-*) support. So
you need to install every library twice to be able to run 32 bit
software.
Gr
On 02/20/2010 04:23 AM, John Black wrote:
>
> 64bit support for proprietary software, on Linux, is disgustingly bad.
>
Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
bit programs..
Am Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:23:36 +0100
schrieb John Black :
> 64bit support for proprietary software, on Linux, is disgustingly bad.
What about asking those developers of proprietary software to release
x86_64 builds, too?
If nobody complains, they won't never change anything.
Greetings,
Heiko
kurrata wrote:
On 02/11/10 19:47, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
See this guys - http://dpaste.com/157512/
All of you're facing the same ? If not, what's the fix ?
After some fighting i did thi "pacman -S qt kdelibs phonon"
After that installed i could start to upgrade rest of the system...i
hope
2010/2/11 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 18:54 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>> On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:50:46 Ionut Biru wrote:
>> > fire up a browser and read the news related to KDE 4.4.
>> or subscribe to arch-announce ;)
>>
> Isn't [arch-announce] dead for the longest time? I remem
On 02/11/10 19:47, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
See this guys - http://dpaste.com/157512/
All of you're facing the same ? If not, what's the fix ?
after some fighting i did this:"pacman -S qt kdelibs phonon"
After the update was done i could update rest of the system..i hope it
wont break
On 02/11/10 19:47, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
See this guys - http://dpaste.com/157512/
All of you're facing the same ? If not, what's the fix ?
After some fighting i did thi "pacman -S qt kdelibs phonon"
After that installed i could start to upgrade rest of the system...i
hope it wont break
2010/2/11 Ng Oon-Ee
> On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 18:54 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:50:46 Ionut Biru wrote:
> > > fire up a browser and read the news related to KDE 4.4.
> > or subscribe to arch-announce ;)
> >
> Isn't [arch-announce] dead for the longest time? I r
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 18:54 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:50:46 Ionut Biru wrote:
> > fire up a browser and read the news related to KDE 4.4.
> or subscribe to arch-announce ;)
>
Isn't [arch-announce] dead for the longest time? I remember getting 1
month worth of
It is wise to subscribe to all possible arch lists.
That's what I do!
On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:50:46 Ionut Biru wrote:
> fire up a browser and read the news related to KDE 4.4.
or subscribe to arch-announce ;)
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
This is related to recent update of KDE. You have to update system in two
steps:
pacman -Sy --asdeps qt
pacman -Su
(http://www.archlinux.org/news/483/)
On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:47:43 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> See this guys - http://dpaste.com/157512/
>
> All of you're facing the sam
On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:47:43 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> See this guys - http://dpaste.com/157512/
>
> All of you're facing the same ? If not, what's the fix ?
http://www.archlinux.org/news/483/
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
On 02/11/2010 07:47 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
See this guys - http://dpaste.com/157512/
All of you're facing the same ? If not, what's the fix ?
fire up a browser and read the news related to KDE 4.4.
--
Ionut
31 matches
Mail list logo
