Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:25 -0400, Kyle wrote: > According to Ralf Mardorf: > > I'm still using grub legacy on my machine. Is there a reason not to use > > grub legacy anymore? I also used grub2, but I don't like it. I never > > used any other bootloader on a PC. > > I never noticed any drawbacks u

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Kyle
According to Ralf Mardorf: I'm still using grub legacy on my machine. Is there a reason not to use grub legacy anymore? I also used grub2, but I don't like it. I never used any other bootloader on a PC. I never noticed any drawbacks using grub legacy. If you are planning to keep your bootloader i

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
On 09/11/12 at 09:58am, Rodrigo Rivas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Curtis Shimamoto < > sugar.and.scru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The link I provided clearly shows you how to install to the mbr of a > > partition. > > > > As Bjoern Franke pointed out previously in this thread, there

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:26 -0400, Stephen E. Baker wrote: > On 10/09/2012 6:57 AM, Kyle wrote: > > According to Thomas Bächler: > >> Let me also express part of my personal opinion, which others might > >> disagree with: If you wanted high quality software, why did you install > >> GRUB? If you wa

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Stephen E. Baker
On 10/09/2012 6:57 AM, Kyle wrote: According to Thomas Bächler: Let me also express part of my personal opinion, which others might disagree with: If you wanted high quality software, why did you install GRUB? If you want a decent bootloader, use syslinux. Actually, at least from where I'm si

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-11 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Curtis Shimamoto < sugar.and.scru...@gmail.com> wrote: > The link I provided clearly shows you how to install to the mbr of a > partition. > As Bjoern Franke pointed out previously in this thread, there is no such thing as "the MBR of a partition". MBRs are only a

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
On 09/10/12 at 04:20am, John Hutchison wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:29:22AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > I have /dev/sda1 root, /dev/sda2 swap and /dev/sda3 /home. So this is not > > a single partition setup but a three partition setup if you count swap. > Assume for this that /dev/sda

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Kyle
According to Thomas Bächler: Let me also express part of my personal opinion, which others might disagree with: If you wanted high quality software, why did you install GRUB? If you want a decent bootloader, use syslinux. Actually, at least from where I'm sitting, this "personal opinion" has a

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread John Hutchison
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:29:22AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I have /dev/sda1 root, /dev/sda2 swap and /dev/sda3 /home. So this is not > a single partition setup but a three partition setup if you count swap. Assume for this that /dev/sda is the bootloader _AND_ the device. As was said before

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 10.09.2012 10:12, schrieb Jude DaShiell: > I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used > --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with > misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64 > target on the arch beginner's guide wa

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Bjoern Franke wrote: > > > > > > I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used > > --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with > > misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64 > > target on the arch b

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Bjoern Franke
> > I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used > --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with > misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64 > target on the arch beginner's guide was for ufi not bios. A bug like this >

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-10 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Curtis Shimamoto wrote: > On 09/09/12 at 11:15pm, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > I am learning more about my hardware doing an archlinux installation on an > > amd k8 athelon system. Apparently grub won't work without use of > > blocklists and it complains that blocklists are unre

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-09 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
On 09/09/12 at 11:15pm, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I am learning more about my hardware doing an archlinux installation on an > amd k8 athelon system. Apparently grub won't work without use of > blocklists and it complains that blocklists are unreliable so cannot embed > and for that reason won't i

Re: [arch-general] amd64 systems and archlinux

2012-09-09 Thread Victor Silva
2012/9/10 Jude DaShiell > I am learning more about my hardware doing an archlinux installation on an > amd k8 athelon system. Apparently grub won't work without use of > blocklists and it complains that blocklists are unreliable so cannot embed > and for that reason won't install. Fortunately a