On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:49:55AM +, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> It's a bit a shame that there isn't any default good indexing system
> for Linux.
> Now there is also a inotify implementation and tools to set up
> watchers on the filesystem,
> so why are we still mainly stuck with locate and the ex
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Andrea Crotti
wrote:
> It's a bit a shame that there isn't any default good indexing system for
> Linux.
> Now there is also a inotify implementation and tools to set up watchers on
> the filesystem,
> so why are we still mainly stuck with locate and the expensive
On 02/26/2012 12:23 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
It is only for Linux. That was my barrier. It has no portability to Mac or
BSDs. It is a great tool and really comes in handy.
There is an package called inotify-tools that does some basic watching.
I've used it in the past.
Calvin
Well mac has
On 02/26/2012 12:18 PM, Raven wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:49:55 +0800, Andrea Crotti
wrote:
It's a bit a shame that there isn't any default good indexing system
for Linux.
Now there is also a inotify implementation and tools to set up
watchers on the filesystem,
so why are we still mainly
It is only for Linux. That was my barrier. It has no portability to Mac or
BSDs. It is a great tool and really comes in handy.
There is an package called inotify-tools that does some basic watching.
I've used it in the past.
Calvin
On Feb 26, 2012 6:50 AM, "Andrea Crotti" wrote:
> It's a bit a
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:49:55 +0800, Andrea Crotti
wrote:
It's a bit a shame that there isn't any default good indexing system for
Linux.
Now there is also a inotify implementation and tools to set up watchers
on the filesystem,
so why are we still mainly stuck with locate and the expensiv
6 matches
Mail list logo
