Re: [arch-general] packager sometimes missing in arch's web interface

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Adam Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * On Monday, August 11 2008, Jan de Groot wrote: > >>Our web frontend works with 2 things when it comes to assigning >>maintainers: >>- the repository it is in >>- the architecture of the package >> >>So when I package glib2, I

Re: [arch-general] packager sometimes missing in arch's web interface

* On Monday, August 11 2008, Jan de Groot wrote: >Our web frontend works with 2 things when it comes to assigning >maintainers: >- the repository it is in >- the architecture of the package > >So when I package glib2, I add two packages, one for i686 and one for >x86_64. Because of our signoff pol

Re: [arch-general] packager sometimes missing in arch's web interface

On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 04:42 -0400, Adam Vogt wrote: > I'm wondering whether it is a bug that [1] and [2] don't claim to have > maintainers, but they actually do. > > If the web interface doesn't know of a maintainer, can it still send the > maintainer an email that it is outdated (which is the c