Arvid:
Linux from scratch.
2009/12/3 Arvid Picciani :
>>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
I personally think your mis-reading the "Arch Way".
>
>
>> So another person who mistakes the use of simplicity for minimalism. I
>> thought we had been through that many, many times.
>
>
> Can we, independently of the technical details of
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:08:29 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Please, can we stop beating it now, and just officialy tell minimalists
to fuck off so everyone can stop wasting their time?
I've been following this thread off an on. Great to see you having an
opinion and standing up for it, the s
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 14:00 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> For a thread with subject "peaceful" this has really gone downhill.
>
> Anyway, I doubt anybody that "matters" in terms of making decisions
> around here is still reading this. I only read the last couple of
> emails out of some sort of mo
For a thread with subject "peaceful" this has really gone downhill.
Anyway, I doubt anybody that "matters" in terms of making decisions
around here is still reading this. I only read the last couple of
emails out of some sort of morbid curiosity...
Allan
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 04:36 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> > Arvid Picciani wrote:
> >> It's done. All i want is to settle this in a useful way.
>
> Nathan Wayde wrote:
> > I originally identified you as a poisonous person and you just keep
> > confirming my theory.
>
> a I found a problem
> b I
Arvid Picciani wrote:
It's done. All i want is to settle this in a useful way.
Nathan Wayde wrote:
I originally identified you as a poisonous person and you just keep
confirming my theory.
a I found a problem
b I made aware of the problem
c I have provided patches
d I have provided package
On 03/12/09 23:49, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Heiko Baums wrote:
Show me a more minimalist distribution than Arch and Gentoo. I guess
you won't find one. And if you did I suggest you switching to this
distro.
This is the entire reason i want arch to officialy state that these
users are not welcome
Heiko Baums wrote:
So why do you continue ranting about Arch?
I tried not to. All i wanted is a clear cut, but i think i'm alone with
that wish, so i'll stop beating it.
You're the ones who'll have to deal with this procedure over and over
again (not with me. no worries)
--
Arvid
Asgaard
Am Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:49:14 +0100
schrieb Arvid Picciani :
> This is the entire reason i want arch to officialy state that these
> users are not welcome. I want to move on, so we can split up the user
> bases. Ultimately so both sides can continue their life without the
> constant (and i'm mea
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 00:49 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> > Show me a more minimalist distribution than Arch and Gentoo. I guess
> > you won't find one. And if you did I suggest you switching to this
> > distro.
>
> This is the entire reason i want arch to officialy state
2009/12/3 Arvid Picciani :
> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
>> I actually think the you've been over-focusing on a single part of the
>> 'arch way', that its 'all about' minimalism.
>
> then i suggest we remove the statement that it is all about minimalism.
>
>> Throughout this thread the vibe I've been gettin
Heiko Baums wrote:
Show me a more minimalist distribution than Arch and Gentoo. I guess
you won't find one. And if you did I suggest you switching to this
distro.
This is the entire reason i want arch to officialy state that these
users are not welcome. I want to move on, so we can split up t
Am Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:08:29 +0100
schrieb Arvid Picciani :
> then i suggest we remove the statement that it is all about
> minimalism.
This statement shouldn't be removed.
Minimalism doesn't mean that no optional features are compiled into a
package. Minimalism also doesn't mean that every pack
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:28 PM, wrote:
> I'd suggest to tell those who want a bloated system with
> lots of useless dependencies to move to Ubuntu or Fedora
> so everybody can stop wasting his/her time.
I wouldn't go that far. That kind of attitude is what derails the
conversation. Again, simpli
Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
Please, stop filling my inbox with useless junk.
Please use the kill thread option of your MUA. Messages like this aren't
helping anyone, and are especcialy not helping to minimize the thread
length.
--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies
Please, stop filling my inbox with useless junk.
f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:08:29AM +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Please, can we stop beating it now, and just officialy tell
minimalists to fuck off so everyone can stop wasting their time?
Bad spelling and foul language.
Yeah once again i fail at not offending a
2009/12/3 Ng Oon-Ee :
> Arch is what you make it.
I think you nailed it. I always thought the Arch Way as a principle,
not a rule. We're not a religion, neither a nation. The few rules we
have are for the well of the community, so that it can go forward
without losing time with nitpicking.
The Ar
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:08:29AM +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Please, can we stop beating it now, and just officialy tell
> minimalists to fuck off so everyone can stop wasting their time?
Bad spelling and foul language.
I'd suggest to tell those who want a bloated system with
lots of useles
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
I actually think the you've been over-focusing on a single part of the
'arch way', that its 'all about' minimalism.
then i suggest we remove the statement that it is all about minimalism.
Throughout this thread the vibe I've been getting for you is that you
somehow feel disa
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 23:23 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> >> Allan McRae wrote:
> >>
> >>> I personally think your mis-reading the "Arch Way".
>
>
> > So another person who mistakes the use of simplicity for minimalism. I
> > thought we had been through that many, many times.
>
>
> Can we, i
22 matches
Mail list logo
