Jason Chu wrote:
> I'm happy with these changes. Now the only real question that needs
> to be answered should this be srcpac 0.6 or srcpac 1.0?
I'd vote for 0.6 (there might be still room for improvement: ie.
localization?).
Michael
--
Michael Klier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 20:38 -0700, Jason Chu wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jason Chu wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Jason Chu wrote:
> >> >> Yeah, put those in your public repo too
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Chu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Jason Chu wrote:
>> >> Yeah, put those in your public repo too and then I'll release a new
>> >> version of srcpac.
>> >
>> >
Jason Chu wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jason Chu wrote:
> >> Yeah, put those in your public repo too and then I'll release a new
> >> version of srcpac.
> >
> > Ok, almost finished, though one problem remains. Using nobody actually
> > does
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Chu wrote:
>> Yeah, put those in your public repo too and then I'll release a new
>> version of srcpac.
>
> Ok, almost finished, though one problem remains. Using nobody actually doesn't
> work because when you su nob
Jason Chu wrote:
> Yeah, put those in your public repo too and then I'll release a new
> version of srcpac.
Ok, almost finished, though one problem remains. Using nobody actually doesn't
work because when you su nobody -c the system will enforce a
password change.
That leaves 3 options: a) we u
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Loui wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:20:37 -0700
>> "Jason Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I
>> > guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work...
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not clear, at least not to me:
>
>- undecided whether to keep the package specific configs in /etc/srcpac.d
> or in /var/srcpac
Of the two, I'd suggest /etc/srcpac.d - it's essentially configuration data.
>-
Loui wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:20:37 -0700
> "Jason Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I
> > guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work... you'd need something
> > pointing back to that user...
> >
> > I'm a little con
Michael Klier wrote:
Jason Chu wrote:
Alrighty, mostly a couple questions:
Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I
guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work... you'd need something
pointing back to that user...
I don't know if that's possible, because you don'
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:52:23 +0200
> Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> >
>> > The DB scripts actually do it this way:
>> >
>> > getpkgname() {
>> > local tmp
>> >
>> > tmp=${1##*/}
On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:20:37 -0700
"Jason Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I
> guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work... you'd need something
> pointing back to that user...
>
> I'm a little confused why ${i-*-*-*} doesn't
On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:52:23 +0200
Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >
> > The DB scripts actually do it this way:
> >
> > getpkgname() {
> > local tmp
> >
> > tmp=${1##*/}
> > tmp=${tmp%$PKGEXT}
> > tmp=${tmp%-$CARCH}
> >
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > Alrighty, mostly a couple questions:
> >
> > Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I
> > guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work... you'd need something
> > pointing back to that user...
> >
> > I'm a little confused why ${i-*-*-*} doesn't
Jason Chu wrote:
> Alrighty, mostly a couple questions:
>
> Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I
> guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work... you'd need something
> pointing back to that user...
I don't know if that's possible, because you don't know whether
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan McGee wrote:
>>> I agree, this is a smart move. My only real thought is why have
>>> anything in /etc/ at all? It would be great if this could al
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan McGee wrote:
>> I agree, this is a smart move. My only real thought is why have
>> anything in /etc/ at all? It would be great if this could all be done
>> non-root for editing any config settings and such. Maybe ~/.src
Dan McGee wrote:
> I agree, this is a smart move. My only real thought is why have
> anything in /etc/ at all? It would be great if this could all be done
> non-root for editing any config settings and such. Maybe ~/.srcpac/ or
> something?
>
> It also seems almost overkill to need another user to
Jason Chu wrote:
> Hot!
>
> I was hoping someone would do this. I originally wrote srcpac as an
> example of how such a thing could be done. Then people actually
> started using it!
>
> I will do my best to look at your patches tonight. I'll even put a
> reminder in my phone. I'll get back to
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:07 AM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 5/22/08, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi Archers,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> oh man. I got excited reading this.
>>
>> I really like the first cha
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:07 AM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/22/08, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Archers,
>>
>>
>>
>
> oh man. I got excited reading this.
>
> I really like the first change you made. Using a directory with
> package specific sed changes on a per file
On 5/22/08, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Archers,
>
>
>
oh man. I got excited reading this.
I really like the first change you made. Using a directory with
package specific sed changes on a per file basis is a kick ass idea.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Archers,
>
> in the past weeks there was a little discussion in the forums about the
> purpose of ABS vs. AUR and when to use which of both tools. Srcpac was
> mentioned as being the right tool to install customized pack
23 matches
Mail list logo
